CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Decagon claims its customers service bots are smarter than average

From TechCrunch

By Kyle Wiggers

June 18, 2024

Decagon claims its customers service bots are smarter than average

Decagon claims its customers service bots are smarter than average

One red-hot category in the generative AI space is customer support, which isn’t surprising, really, when you consider the tech’s potential to cut contact center costs while increasing scale. Critics argue that generative AI-powered customer support tech could depress wages, lead to layoffs and ultimately deliver a more error-prone end-user experience. Proponents, on the other hand, say that generative AI will augment — not replace — workers, while enabling them to focus on more meaningful tasks.

Jesse Zhang is in the proponents camp. Of course, he’s a little biased. Along with Ashwin Sreenivas, Zhang co-founded Decagon, a generative AI platform to automate various aspects of customer support channels.

Zhang is well aware of how stiff the competition is in the market for AI-powered customer support, which spans not only tech giants like Google and Amazon but startups such as Parloa, Retell AI and Cognigy (which recently raised $100 million). By one estimate, the sector could be worth $2.89 billion by 2032, up from $308.4 million in 2022.

But Zhang thinks that both Decagon’s engineering expertise and go-to-market approach give it an advantage. “When we first started, the prevailing advice we received was to not pursue the customer support space, because it was too crowded,” Zhang told TechCrunch. “Ultimately, the thing that worked for us was to aggressively prioritize what customers wanted and maintain laser focus on what customers would get value from. That’s the difference between a real business and a flashy AI demo.”

Both Zhang and Sreenivas have technical backgrounds, having worked at both startups and larger tech orgs. Zhang was a software engineer at Google before becoming an intern trader at Citadel Securities, the hedge fund, and founding Lowkey, a social gaming platform that was acquired by Pokémon GO maker Niantic in 2021. Sreenivas was a deployment strategist at Palantir before co-founding computer vision startup Helia, which he sold to unicorn Scale AI in 2020.

Decagon, which sells primarily to enterprises and “high-growth” startups, develops what amount to customer support chatbots. The bots, driven by first- and third-party AI models, are fine-tunable, capable of ingesting a businesses’ knowledge bases and historical customer conversations to gain greater contextual understanding of issues.

“As we started building, we realized that ‘human-like bots’ entails a lot, since human agents are capable of complex reasoning, taking actions and analyzing conversations after the fact,” Zhang said. “From talking to customers, it’s clear that while everyone wants greater operational efficiency, it cannot come at the expense of customer experience — no one likes chatbots.”

So how aren’t Decagon’s bots like traditional chatbots? Well, Zhang says they learn from past conversations and feedback. Perhaps more importantly, they can integrate with other apps to take actions on behalf of the customer or agent, like processing a refund, categorizing an incoming message or helping write a support article.

On the back end, companies get analytics and control over Decagon’s bots and their conversations.

“Human agents are able to analyze conversations to notice trends and find improvements,” Zhang said. “Our AI-powered analytics dashboard automatically reviews and tags customer conversations to identify themes, flag anomalies and suggest additions to their knowledge base to better address customer inquiries.”

Now, generative AI has a reputation for being, well, less than perfect — and, in some cases, ethically compromised. What would Zhang say to companies wary that Decagon’s bots will tell someone to eat glue or write an article full of plagiarized content, or that Decagon will train its in-house models on their data?

Basically, he says, don’t worry. “Providing customers with the necessary guardrails and monitoring for their AI agents has been important,” he said. “We optimize our models for our customers, but we do this in a way which ensures that it is impossible for any data to be inadvertently exposed to another customer. For instance, a model that generates an answer for customer A would never have any exposure to data from customer B.”

Decagon’s tech — while subject to the same limitations as every other generative AI-powered app out there — has been attracting name-brand clients as of late, like Eventbrite, Bilt and Substack, helping Decagon to reach break-even. Notable investors have climbed aboard the venture, too, including Box CEO Aaron Levie, Airtable CEO Howie Liu and Lattice CEO Jack Altman.

To date, Decagon has raised $35 million across seed and Series A rounds that had participation from Andreessen Horowitz, Accel (which led the Series A), A* and entrepreneur Elad Gil. Zhang says that the cash is being put toward product development and expanding Decagon’s San Francisco-based workforce.

“A key challenge is that customers equate AI agents to previous generation chatbots, which don’t actually get the job done,” Zhang said. “The customer support market is saturated with older chatbots, which have eroded lost consumer trust. New solutions from this generation must cut through the noise of the incumbents.”

View original article on techcrunch.com

Most Recent

Intero Biosystems wants drugmakers to test on mini human intestines, not animals

Intero Biosystems is selling lab-grown human intestines to drugmakers as regulators push for alternatives to animal testing, while the startup looks to scale production and expand its organoid technology.

Oct 14, 2026

CedarDB wants one database to handle both transactions and analytics, as AI agents raise the stakes

Databases have traditionally been designed either for analytical data or for operational data. But database engine CedarDB supports both, and its approach has gained relevance with the rise of agentic AI.

Oct 14, 2026

Colossal Biosciences announces new AI platform to help accelerate de-extinction efforts

Colossal announced a new AI platform to help accelerate its de-extinction efforts and Peter Diamandis has launched a new fund to back startups who use it.

Oct 14, 2026

TimeTeller puts our internal clocks at the center of personalized medicine

German startup TimeTeller has developed a saliva test kit to help anyone understand their circadian rhythm; it aims to reduce side effects from cancer treatments.

Oct 14, 2026

Similar Posts

A married founder duo’s company, 14.ai, is replacing customer support teams at startups

14.ai also launched a consumer brand to understand how much AI can handle customer support tasks.

Mar 2, 2026

Level AI applies algorithms to contact center pain points

Level AI offers a suite of AI-powered tools to automate various customer servicentasks.

Jul 23, 2024

Support automation firm Capacity grows with new cash and acquisitions

David Karandish has been busy. Capacity, his support automation company, was planning a $5 million “bridge round” to help the company reach the break-even point. But TVC Capital, Toloka.vc, and the venture’s other backers had something grander in mind. So they threw in an additional $21 million for what became Capacity’s $26 million Series D. While all this was happening, Capacity acquired three companies: enterprise search firm Lucy (which had raised $5.6 million) and two startups focused on c

Oct 16, 2024

Investments in generative AI startups topped $3.9B in Q3 2024

Not everyone is convinced of generative AI’s return on investment. But many investors are, judging by the latest figures from funding tracker PitchBook. In Q3 2024, VCs invested $3.9 billion in generative AI startups across 206 deals, per PitchBook. (That’s not counting OpenAI‘s $6.6 billion round.) And $2.9 billion of that funding went to U.S.-based companies across 127 deals. Some of the biggest winners in Q3 were coding assistant Magic ($320 million in August), enterprise search provider Gle

Oct 20, 2024