CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Privacy FAQ

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Checkly tests software by mimicking the way people use it

From TechCrunch

By Kyle Wiggers

July 31, 2024

Checkly tests software by mimicking the way people use it

Checkly tests software by mimicking the way people use it

It’s not uncommon for developers working at companies of a certain size to have trouble keeping track of all the software dev-related tasks and bugs that need to be addressed. According to a 2024 survey by Dynatrace, 88% of tech leaders say that the complexity of their tech stacks increased in the past year, and that this increased complexity has made it difficult to deliver a satisfactory customer experience.

There’s no shortage of observability vendors out there offering up their products as a fix. But Hannes Lenke, the CEO and co-founder of observability and monitoring company Checkly, makes the case that many are too expensive to use at scale and charge unreasonable additional fees for specific capabilities, support and maintenance.

“Very few engineers have access to full observability and monitoring tools, and many of these tools still run in silos,” Lenke, who launched Checkly with Tim Nolet and Timo Euteneuer in 2018, told TechCrunch. “Moreover, legacy monitoring tools cost companies a fortune, and cutting costs is one of the primary drivers for tool migration.”

Nolet created Checkly a side project to help devs get signals about an app’s performance and downtime, offering a set of subscription-based synthetic monitoring tools. Synthetic monitoring, also known as active monitoring or proactive monitoring, tests software by simulating how a person uses that software, mimicking how a user might behave and then using this data to evaluate performance metrics such as response times and error rates.

Checkly
Image Credits: Checkly

Checkly’s platform, which can monitor APIs in addition to software, runs scheduled or continuous automated test scripts to detect potential problems. Users can define the monitoring as code in an existing codebase and keep it version-controlled, and leverage a “traces” feature to connect backend failures to alerts.

“Our aim is to help developers find issues and fix them 10x faster,” Lenke said. “A synthetic monitoring setup means that you’re the first to know when an issue has occurred, enabling you to resolve it before it reaches your customer.”

Lenke sees not only observability incumbents like DataDog, Splunk and New Relic as rivals but also Pingdom, Runscope and Catchpoint. But he says that Checkly’s business is quite robust: The company has more than 1,000 paying customers including 1Password, Vercel and Yext, and it’s performing 32.5 million checks on APIs and software every day.

That’s gotten investors’ attention.

This week, Checkly announced that it raised $20 million in a Series B funding round led by Balderton Capital with participation from Accel and CRV. Bringing Checkly’s total raised to $32.25 million, the new cash will be put toward product development, expanding Berlin-based Checkley’s 35-person team and opening a satellite office in New York.

“We are seeing an accelerated customer demand for Checkly,” Lenke said. “In response to that, we want to grow our go-to-market teams to onboard even more customers to Checkly.”

Most Recent

Circuit Breaker Labs hopes to make AI safer for your kids (and you)

With all the talk about how AI might one day kill us all, it's easy to forget that AI has already harmed some people psychologically. Circuit Breaker Labs has created "crash-test dummies" to solve that.

Oct 2, 2026

Kevin Mandia’s new ‘agent swarm’ security startup Armadin raises $255.5M at $2.5B valuation

Kevin Mandia, best known as the founder of Mandiant, has a new startup that is using agent swarms to test and protect enterprises.

Oct 1, 2026

Valor, Atreides, and Sequoia back AI startup Flow Engineering at $750M valuation

Flow Engineering, which is bringing AI agents to hardware design, also landed Roelof Botha as an angel investor and board member.

Sep 30, 2026

Is Neko Health’s body scan worth it? Spotify billionaire’s startup has come to America

Watch as Neko Health Investor Farooq Abbasi joins Equity to explain the bet on preventative healthcare, competition and what comes next.

Sep 30, 2026

Similar Posts

Distributional raises $19M to automate AI model and app testing

Distributional, an AI testing platform founded by Intel’s former GM of AI software, Scott Clark, has closed a $19 million Series A funding round led by Two Sigma Ventures. Clark says that Distributional was inspired by the AI testing problems he ran into while applying AI at Intel, and — before that — his work at Yelp as a software lead in the company’s ad-targeting division. “As the value of AI applications continues to grow, so do the operational risks,” he told TechCrunch. “AI product teams

Oct 8, 2024

Qodo raises $40M Series A to bring quality-first code generation and testing to the enterprise

At first glance, Qodo, the startup previously known as CodiumAI, may appear to be yet another AI code generation tool. But the team, which is announcing a $40 million Series A round led by Susa Ventures and Square Peg today, is just as much focused on generating code as on generating the tests and code quality in general. The service launched out of stealth 18 months ago and so far, the company says, over 1 million developers have tried its solutions and a number of Fortune 100 companies have a

Sep 30, 2024

AI comes to software reviews as Stackfix raises $3M

Marketplaces for software and services based on reviews are starting to reach their sell-by date. The user-generated reviews on sites like G2 and Capterra (one of Gartner’s three software directories) have often been accused of being paid for by software vendors. In fact, eight out nine of the reviews on the first page of G2’s reviews of HubSpot are labelled “Incentivized Review.” Born out of the AI-pioneers behind Jukedeck, Stackfix is a startup that has now raised $3 million in seed funding t

Dec 3, 2024

CodeRabbit raises $16M to bring AI to code reviews

Code reviews — peer reviews of code that help devs improve code quality — are time-consuming. According to one source, 50% of companies spend two to five hours a week on them. Without enough people, code reviews can be overwhelming and take devs away from other important work. Harjot Gill thinks that code reviews can be largely automated using artificial intelligence. He’s the co-founder and CEO of CodeRabbit, which analyzes code using AI models to provide feedback. Prior to starting CodeRabbit

Aug 15, 2024