CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Executive assistants, high salaries, and other ways early-stage founders will trigger a seed VC

From TechCrunch

By Julie Bort

December 26, 2024

Executive assistants, high salaries, and other ways early-stage founders will trigger a seed VC

Executive assistants, high salaries, and other ways early-stage founders will trigger a seed VC

VC Jenny Fielding (pictured above), co-founder of Everywhere Ventures and former Techstars managing director, was basically trolling on X when she posted, “Y’all have strong opinions about pre-seed founders who have EAs to help them schedule? Just checking.”

Fielding knew the post was “a little bit snarky,” she told TechCrunch, but it sparked a big conversation. Some people suggested that early-stage founders could simply use AI executive assistants. Others grew affronted that a VC implied that they shouldn’t hire a human to assist, even at the earliest stages of their company.

Fielding’s point, however, was that founders still hold some misconceptions from the excess funding days of 2020-2021 about appropriate cash management, especially during a startup’s early years, when revenue is scarce. That’s when companies should be working on the basics of building a product that people want to buy.

“I was a founder. I started two companies,” she said. “Then I spent seven and a half years at Techstars, really helping very formative companies.” So she tries to “give founders the real information they need, not the fuzzy stuff,” she laughed.

While most seed investors, including Fielding, believe founders should spend their raised cash “how they want to,” early-stage VCs will still be judging founders’ cash management, even if the VC is basically a silent partner.

“We invest at the earliest stages. We don’t take board seats. We’re entrusting this cash to founders. And so yeah, we look at the operating budget, and we have calls with them quarterly,” Fielding said.

Those judgments will materialize when the startup needs to raise its next round and wants its seed/pre-seed VCs to give them warm introductions and raving recommendations to the next crop of investors.

So, while executive assistants can be invaluable at established companies, they are also operational overhead positions — not people helping to build and support the early product.

Beyond an EA for the CEO, there other titles at an early-stage startup that can be a “red flag” to VCs: COO and CFO.

“Oftentimes it’s a third co-founder who doesn’t really know where they fit,” she said, adding that third-wheel co-founders can be “very expensive” both in terms of stock and salaries. “You need to develop a product and then get customers. Not really sure you need the organizational structure of a CFO and COO.”

Which brings up the salaries themselves. This is another area where early investors might keep mum but are paying attention. Fielding actually ended a deal when she analyzed the operating expenses of the startup and saw that “the founder was paying himself $300,000,” she said.

While that salary might simply be matching the pay at the previous Google or Microsoft role, a reasonable salary at the pre-seed level is between $85,000 and $125,000, she advised. It’s a matter of the math. Even if a founder has raised a healthy $1 million pre-seed but pays themselves $200,000, they’ve already spent a fifth of the money.

“We’re not saying you should make $100,000 forever,” she warned, but at the early stage, “you just don’t have that cash to burn.”

This story originally published November 24, 2024.

View original article on techcrunch.com

Most Recent

Daniel Ek’s body-scanning startup Neko Health opens first US office, in New York

The scanning and bloodwork health startup founded by Spotify's founder will officially launch in New York in about a month.

Aug 18, 2026

Thrive’s Joshua Kushner chides Silicon Valley VCs over AI euphoria

The AI opportunity is huge, but "it would also be a grave error in our minds to let excitement weaken our investment discipline," Kushner warns in his first-ever investment letter.

Aug 14, 2026

Databricks wanted to raise $1B, investors wanted $15B. It settled on $5B at a $190B valuation.

AI is expensive, Ali Ghodsi tells TechCrunch. With so many investors wanting into his latest round, he said yes to more than planned.

Aug 13, 2026

AI coding startup Cognition reportedly already in talks to raise at $40B valuation

Cognition may be looking to raise another mega round just a few months after raising $1 billion at a $26 billion valuation.

Aug 12, 2026

Similar Posts

Executive assistants, high salaries, and other ways early-stage founders will trigger a seed VC

VC Jenny Fielding, co-founder of Everywhere Ventures and former Techstars managing director, was basically trolling on X when she posted, “Y’all have strong opinions about pre-seed founders who have EAs to help them schedule? Just checking.” Fielding knew the post was “a little bit snarky,” she told TechCrunch, but it sparked a big conversation. Some people suggested that early-stage founders could simply use AI executive assistants. Others grew affronted that a VC implied that they shouldn’t h

Nov 24, 2024

It’s not your imagination: AI seed startups are commanding higher valuations

Among the most recent Y Combinator cohort, many startups were commanding $40 million valuations. But with more money comes higher expectations.

Mar 31, 2026

Index Ventures’ Jahanvi Sardana shares the truth about TAM and what founders should focus on instead

Index Ventures partner Jahanvi Sardana has a reminder for all those founders worried about finding TAM for their product or service: many startups have emerged from markets that, at the time, were essentially nonexistent.

Jul 25, 2025

While VCs crowd into San Francisco, Endeavor Catalyst raises $320M for founders ‘elsewhere’

Endeavor Catalyst just raised $320 million to keep backing founders outside Silicon Valley. Half the profits go back to the nonprofit that finds them.

Oct 7, 2026