CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Drive Capital’s second act — how the Columbus venture firm found success after a split

From TechCrunch

By Connie Loizos

July 5, 2025

Drive Capital’s second act — how the Columbus venture firm found success after a split

Drive Capital’s second act — how the Columbus venture firm found success after a split

The venture capital world has always had a hot-and-cold relationship with the Midwest. Investors rush in during boom times, then retreat to the coasts when markets turn sour. For Columbus, Ohio-based Drive Capital, this cycle of attention and disinterest played out against the backdrop of its own internal upheaval several years ago — a co-founder split that could have ended the firm but may have ultimately strengthened it.

At a minimum, Drive achieved something newsworthy in today’s venture landscape this past May. The firm returned $500 millio to investors in a single week, distributing nearly $140 million worth of Root Insurance shares within days of cashing out of Austin-based Thoughtful Automation and another undisclosed company.

It could be seen as a gimmick, sure, but limited partners were presumably pleased. “I’m unaware of any other venture firm having been able to achieve that kind of liquidity recently,” said Chris Olsen, Drive’s co-founder and now sole managing partner, who spoke to TechCrunch from the firm’s offices in Columbus’ Short North neighborhood.

It’s a meaningful turnaround for a firm that faced existential questions just three years ago when Olsen and his co-founder Mark Kvamme — both former Sequoia Capital partners — went their separate ways.

The split, which surprised the firm’s investors, saw Kvamme eventually launch the Ohio Fund, a broader investment vehicle focused on the state’s economic development that includes real estate, infrastructure, and manufacturing alongside technology investments.

Drive’s recent success stems from what Olsen calls a deliberately contrarian strategy in an industry preoccupied with “unicorns” and “decacorns” — companies valued at $1 billion and $10 billion, respectively.

“If you were to just read the newspapers or listen to coffee shops on Sand Hill Road, everyone always talks about the $50 billion or $100 billion outcomes,” Olsen said. “But the reality is, while those outcomes do happen, they’re really rare. In the last 20 years, there have only been 12 outcomes in America over $50 billion.”

By contrast, he noted, there have been 127 IPOs at $3 billion or more, plus hundreds of M&A events at that level. “If you’re able to exit companies at $3 billion, then you’re able to do something that happens every single month,” he said.

That rationale underpinned the Thoughtful Automation exit, which Olsen described as “near fund-returning” despite being “below a billion dollars.”

The AI healthcare automation company was sold to private equity firm New Mountain Capital, which combined it with two other companies to form Smarter Technologies. Drive owned “multiples” of the typical Silicon Valley ownership stake in the company, said Olsen, who added that Drive’s typical ownership stake is around 30% on average compared to a Valley firm’s 10% — often because it is the sole venture investor across numerous funding rounds.

“We were the only venture firm who invested in that company,” Olsen said of Thoughtful Automation, which was previously backed by New Mountain, the PE firm. “About 20% of the companies in our portfolio today, we are the sole venture firm in those businesses.”

Portfolio wins and losses

Drive’s track record includes both big successes and big stumbles. The firm was an early investor in Duolingo, backing the language-learning platform when it was pre-revenue after Olsen and Kvamme met founder Luis von Ahn at a bar in Pittsburgh, where Duolingo is based. Today, Duolingo trades on Nasdaq with a market cap of nearly $18 billion.

The firm also invested in Vast Data, a data storage platform last valued at $9 billion in late 2023 (and is reportedly fundraising right now), and Drive made money on the recent Root Insurance distribution despite that company’s rocky public market performance since its late 2020 IPO.

But Drive also experienced the spectacular failure of Olive AI, a Columbus-based healthcare automation startup that raised over $900 million and was valued at $4 billion before eventually selling portions of its business in a fire sale.

What sets Drive apart in both cases, Olsen argues, is its focus on companies building outside Silicon Valley’s hyper-competitive ecosystem. Toward that end, the firm now has employees in six cities — Columbus, Austin, Boulder, Chicago, Atlanta, and Toronto — and says it backs founders who would otherwise face a choice between building near their customers or their investors.

It’s Drive’s secret sauce, he suggests. “Early-stage companies that are based outside of Silicon Valley have a higher bar. They have to be a better business to garner a venture investment from a venture firm in Silicon Valley,” Olsen said. “The same thing applies to us with companies in Silicon Valley. For us to invest in a company in Silicon Valley, it has a higher bar.”

It applies a different lens, seemingly. While many VCs chase companies trying to come up with something entirely novel, Drive has a penchant for startups applying tech to traditional industries. Drive has invested in an autonomous welding company, for example, and what Olsen calls “next-generation dental insurance” — sectors that arguably represent America’s $18 trillion economy beyond Silicon Valley’s tech darlings.

Whether that focus, or Drive’s momentum, translates into a big new fund for Drive remains to be seen. The firm is currently managing assets that it raised when Kvamme was still on board, and according to Olsen, it has 30% left to invest of its current fund, a $1 billion vehicle announced in June 2022.

Asked about cash-on-cash returns to date, Olsen said that with $2.2 billion in assets under management across all of Drive’s funds, all are “top quartile funds” with “north of 4x net on our most mature funds” and “continuing to grow from there.”

In the meantime, Drive’s thesis about Columbus as a legitimate tech hub received further validation this week when Palmer Luckey, Peter Thiel, and other tech billionaires announced plans to launch Erebor, a crypto-focused bank headquartered in Columbus.

“When we started Drive in 2012, people thought we were nuts,” Olsen said. “Now you’re seeing literally the people I think of as being the smartest minds in technology — whether it’s Elon Musk or Larry Ellison or Peter Thiel — moving out of Silicon Valley and opening massive presences in different cities.”

View original article on techcrunch.com

Most Recent

Daniel Ek’s body-scanning startup Neko Health opens first US office, in New York

The scanning and bloodwork health startup founded by Spotify's founder will officially launch in New York in about a month.

Aug 18, 2026

Thrive’s Joshua Kushner chides Silicon Valley VCs over AI euphoria

The AI opportunity is huge, but "it would also be a grave error in our minds to let excitement weaken our investment discipline," Kushner warns in his first-ever investment letter.

Aug 14, 2026

Databricks wanted to raise $1B, investors wanted $15B. It settled on $5B at a $190B valuation.

AI is expensive, Ali Ghodsi tells TechCrunch. With so many investors wanting into his latest round, he said yes to more than planned.

Aug 13, 2026

AI coding startup Cognition reportedly already in talks to raise at $40B valuation

Cognition may be looking to raise another mega round just a few months after raising $1 billion at a $26 billion valuation.

Aug 12, 2026

Similar Posts

Drive Capital’s Columbus gamble is paying off

This week on StrictlyVC Download, TechCrunch EIC Connie Loizos is joined by Drive Capital co-founder Chris Olsen. Chris explains how Drive’s contrarian approach to fund size, ownership stakes, and geographic focus is generating returns where other firms are right now struggling. They also discuss the firm’s current composition, three years after Olsen and his co-founder in the firm, Mark Kvamme, went their separate ways after originally meeting as colleagues at Sequoia Capital. Plus: Why Silicon Valley billionaires are choosing Columbus, and what the “venture reckoning” means for the industry.

Jul 8, 2025

Initialized Capital restructures, and lets multiple partners go

Initialized Capital is restructuring its team to “meet the moment” in the venture market, according to a blog post from the firm’s managing partner Brett Gibson. The San Francisco-based venture capital firm, originally founded by Alexis Ohanian, Garry Tan, and Harjeet Taggar, announced yesterday that it let multiple people go and specifically named Jennifer Wolf, who had been with the firm since 2016 in various roles, including, most recently, as a managing partner. Cyndi Reseburg, Intialized’s

Oct 3, 2024

Benchmark is raising $170M for it’s latest partners-only fund

While fund sizes of many venture capital firms have ballooned into billions of dollars over the last decade, Benchmark Partners, one of Silicon Valley’s most successful investors, has stuck to raising approximately $425 million in capital every few years. That’s what the storied firm told in a letter to its limited partners when it announced its latest fund this summer, reported the Information. However, Benchmark’s partners are not limiting themselves to whatever capital commitment they make

Oct 21, 2024

Why Index Ventures is bulking up its investment team in NYC

While online discourse would make it seem that venture has retreated to the Bay Area, with San Francisco being the most important place to build a startup, Index Ventures is looking to bulk up its New York-based investing team. The firm is currently looking to hire another New York-based investor with plans to add three or four new people to the team within the next year, Shardul Shah, a partner at Index Ventures, told TechCrunch. That’s an aggressive addition to the current 10-member team. “Fo

Sep 28, 2024