CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Iconiq’s Will Griffith explains how his firm celebrated Figma’s IPO and why investors sold shares

From TechCrunch

By Julie Bort

July 31, 2025

Iconiq’s Will Griffith explains how his firm celebrated Figma’s IPO and why investors sold shares

Iconiq’s Will Griffith explains how his firm celebrated Figma’s IPO and why investors sold shares

Will Griffith had only been two months in his job as a venture investor for Iconiq when he met a 19-year-old college dropout named Dylan Field. This would lead to one of his signature seed investments, in a startup called Figma.

On Thursday, Figma went public with the stock popping from the $33 IPO opening price to close at $115.50 and a $47 billion market cap. And Griffith could not be more effusive in his praise for the company.

“You go to one of these user conferences and you’re like, there’s 15,000 people here and 5,000 have Figma tattoos,” Griffith smiled. From the earliest days, the founders of this company that offers software for designers had “a fervent desire to win and deliver and redefine this ecosystem.”

Yet in 2013 at that first meeting, co-founders Dylan Field and Evan Wallace were untested. And at that point, so was Iconiq. It was known then as the very secretive wealth management firm for many of Silicon Valley’s richest tech moguls, like Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey.

Figma, however, already had a champion: Field had been an intern at LinkedIn under its then CEO Jeff Weiner. Weiner was an angel investor (and bought more stock at later rounds, too) and introduced Field to Griffith.

“We got connected to Figma before we had an early fund, before we had any venture fund,” Griffith told TechCrunch. The investor remembers trekking out to meet the founders. “It was like two guys and the dog in an apartment in Palo Alto, and they were working on these newfangled graphics and design capability in a browser.”

The demo showed how light could be manipulated when editing a photo in a browser. At the time, browser-based design software, based on WebGL, was revolutionary. Tech giant Adobe had the graphics design market locked up with its desktop software. “I thought it was insane,” Griffith recalled.

The idea was so unproven Alexis Ohanian, who was investing out of his then firm Initialized, passed on Figma when he saw the product years later in 2016, he noted in a tweet this week. Ohanian called Figma a member of his “embarrassing miss-list.”

But Griffith wrote a check. Seed shares, by the way, were priced at $0.0878 each, Figma disclosed in its S-1A. And Griffith wrote more checks as Figma raised additional rounds. The company raised a total of about $332 million in venture funding through 2024, PitchBook estimates. 

“We invested in the seed. We invested in the Series A. We invested further. We did some secondary and we also invested more meaningfully a year ago,” Griffith said. 

Iconiq did not wind up owning at least 5% of the company, a bar that would require Figma to publicly disclose the size of its stake. But it owns enough that the IPO will be celebrated at the Iconiq offices.

“One of the ways that we celebrate is we guess what the closing day stock price is going to be on the first day. It’s a prediction contest around the firm,” Griffith said. “There are some good prizes and rewards.” If someone nails that number, they could wind up with a healthy cash bonus or even something like a trip to Hawaii. 

As for the odd part of this IPO, Griffith has some insight. Most of the stock sold was from investors’ stakes, including Field’s, rather than new shares issued by the company, the company said.

“I think it’s very generous that existing investors are willing to sell as much to create enough supply for this IPO,” he said.

Figma’s fundamentals are so solid that the IPO was 40 times oversubscribed, according to Bloomberg, meaning far more investors wanted shares than the supply available.

That can be almost as problematic as investor disinterest, Griffith explained. The largest institutional investors won’t bother with an IPO where they can’t trade hundreds of millions’ worth of shares, he said. And if an IPO doesn’t float enough shares, prices of available shares could become artificially inflated, meaning the company won’t be properly valued. Should prices decline after opening day, the company could be artificially devalued as well.

Figma’s existing shareholders didn’t really want to sell shares at $33, Griffith said. “We have been with this business since 2015, and we haven’t sold a share. And we are going to be meaningful buyers in the IPO,” he said.

Still, Griffith emphasized that for Figma, IPO day is just a milestone and not an end. “I met a young, 19-year-old Dylan, and we forged a partnership,” he said. He describes himself as “proud” of seeing Field, Figma’s CEO, “continue to just mature and grow, but have the same vision, morals, authenticity.“

In the meantime, he says he’ll be spending Figma’s IPO day “meeting with the next generation of founders.”

View original article on techcrunch.com

Most Recent

Dream Labs raises $90M to help build more intelligent robots with simple video feeds

Dream Labs, a startup trying to make robots more intelligent and capable of performing many different tasks, has raised $90 million in seed funding to coincide with the launch of a public application programming interface that provides access to its universal robot foundation model. Today’s round wa

Oct 19, 2026

Seattle ag-tech startup Carbon Robotics reduces workforce, citing economic conditions

Carbon Robotics, the Seattle-based agricultural technology startup known for its AI-powered, laser-weeding farm implements, has trimmed its workforce. The company did not disclose the total number of layoffs, but confirmed to GeekWire on Monday that the cuts affected employees across multiple depart

Oct 19, 2026

Trump administration orders ban on DeepSeek in federal agencies

The Department of Homeland Security has ordered artificial intelligence technology from the Chinese company DeepSeek Ltd. be removed from all federal civilian agencies. The order, published on the Federal Register website today, warned that DeepSeek’s AI models present “multiple threat vectors,” tha

Oct 19, 2026

AI work assistant startup Town secures unicorn status after raising $108M just weeks after launching

Town.com Inc., an artificial intelligence agent startup laser focused on getting work done by collaborating with other AI agents, revealed today that it has raised $108 million in a new funding at a $1 billion valuation. The Series B round was led by Forerunner Ventures and Menlo Ventures, and saw p

Oct 19, 2026

Similar Posts

Figma’s Dylan Field will cash out about $60M in IPO, with Index, Kleiner, Greylock, Sequoia all selling, too

Figma is allowing existing shareholders to sell more stock than the company will in its IPO.

Jul 21, 2025

Figma moves closer to a blockbuster IPO that could raise $1.5B

The financials are impressive and founder CEO Dylan Field already cashed out $20 million worth of shares last year.

Jul 1, 2025

From Skims to Stripe, here are the startups that are likely — or definitely — not having IPOs this year

A few more IPOs this year are likely but which companies will list aren't necessarily who investors were hoping for in 2023.

Aug 7, 2024

Figma’s IPO success is ‘a little bit of a meme stock,’ says Sapphire Ventures’ Jai Das

Sapphire Ventures' Jai Das joins Equity to discuss Figma's IPO debut and what it reveals about today's startup exit climate.

Aug 6, 2025