CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Four safeguards to stop your AI agents from going rogue

From SiliconAngle

By Amit Zavery

August 30, 2026

Four safeguards to stop your AI agents from going rogue

Four safeguards to stop your AI agents from going rogue

Artificial intelligence agents are moving from experimentation to production, and with this shift, the stakes are rising.

A coding agent at PocketOS recently deleted an entire production database. An agent at Meta exposed sensitive user data for two hours. An Instagram support chatbot allowed hackers to hijack thousands of accounts. And last month, researchers tricked a GitHub agent into leaking private repository data.

In each case, the agent did what it was built to do; what failed was everything around it. Intelligence is advancing faster than organizations can safely deploy it. Providing enough context and controls to ensure an agent produces accurate results and doesn’t overstep its bounds is the core quandary.

This difficulty helps to explain why model vendors have been investing in partnerships to help their customers make AI work, and why “forward-deployed engineer” has become the hottest job in tech. Models excel at pattern recognition, but safe deployment demands understanding thousands of disconnected systems, data structures, and compliance rules that power businesses’ operations.

Closing this gap doesn’t require an army of consultants. It requires an architectural framework with four characteristics, each one helping to convert probabilistic outputs from an AI system into verifiable decisions your business can trust.

Sense

An agent is only as reliable as the information it works with. If a policy changes, a system goes down, or a customer’s status shifts, and that update doesn’t reach the AI in time, every decision downstream is going to be made against facts that are out of date. Sense is the architectural layer that keeps that picture current.

Building this means connecting to data wherever it lives, across departments, systems, and clouds, rather than requiring everything to be centralized, which is why enterprise AI projects often stall before they start. It also means treating this data as a live signal, not a snapshot. The system needs to notice material changes and pass that forward in real time, not on the next scheduled sync.

Decide

Data shows what’s happening now. It doesn’t show what happened the last time someone made a similar decision, or why that outcome mattered. This difference separates an agent that can “see” your business from one that understands how it runs.

Building this judgment into AI means grounding it in an organization’s own decision history and policies, not just its live data. An agent handling a routine request should have access to how the last 20 similar requests were resolved, and what happened as a result. In the Meta incident, an internal agent gave an engineer flawed technical guidance that led to data being exposed. With better context, drawn from how similar historical changes played out, this outcome might have been avoided.

Act

An agent that makes recommendations still leaves the work to people. Maximizing the return on AI investments requires agents that can execute, not just advise.

Building one capable agent is manageable. Coordinating several into a workflow takes many layers. The system needs to pass context between steps, apply consistent policy at each one, and stay in sync as underlying systems change, all without losing the governance that keeps an agent from acting outside its lane. This orchestration layer enables agents to work in concert and reliably complete end-to-end tasks.

Secure

Autonomous tools need the same access discipline a company already applies to its employees: scoped identity, permissions limited to the specific task, and a clear audit trail.

In the Instagram incident, tighter scoping and a real-time check on what the bot was authorized to do might have caught the error. Every agent needs a permission set tied to its specific role and logging of every action it takes. They also require a kill switch — a way to cut off an agent’s access the moment something looks wrong. All the identity and access management best practices your company already knows, now need to be extended to non-human actors.

The upside is still real

None of those prerequisites detracts from how far models have come and what they can achieve. Models are advancing rapidly, and their capabilities are real. But intelligence was never the hard part. Connecting it safely to a business — its systems, its rules, its history of what’s worked and what hasn’t — is where a lot of AI investments lag. Agentic AI has real upside for the businesses that get there. Sense, decide, act, and secure are how you get there safely.

Amit Zavery is president, chief product officer and chief operating officer of ServiceNow Inc. He wrote this article for SiliconANGLE.

View original article on siliconangle.com

Most Recent

ServiceNow AI Control Tower: Selling a penthouse while building the frame

ServiceNow Inc. is making one of the more consequential and visible bets in enterprise AI. The company says AI Control Tower can discover and govern any agent, work across models and clouds, track cost and value, and shut down behavior that violates policy. That sales pitch plays directly to Service

Oct 17, 2026

What to expect during Dell’s ‘Cyber Resilience’ event: Join theCUBE Oct. 27

Data protection and cyber recovery are foundational to enterprise AI. See how Dell is rethinking resilience at the theCUBE's Oct. 27 summit.

Oct 16, 2026

RapidCanvas raises $29M to develop custom AI applications for enterprises

Software development startup RapidCanvas Inc. today announced that it has raised $29 million in funding. Vertex Ventures SEA & India led the Series B round with contributions from Hitachi Ventures, Accel, Peak XV Partners, Valley Capital Partners and Titanium Ventures. The deal follows a $16 million

Oct 16, 2026

Band launches desktop app for developer collaboration and control of multiple AI coding agents

Artificial intelligence agentic collaboration platform for multi-agent systems Thenovi AI Ltd., also known as Band, announced Thursday the launch of Band for Developers, a platform and new desktop application that allows software engineers to manage multiple coding agents at once. As software develo

Oct 16, 2026

Similar Posts

Identity and permissions aren’t enough to govern AI agent behavior

Presented by BoxIdentity and permissions are no longer enough to secure enterprise AI agents. They govern what an agent can reach, not how it behaves once it starts working on its own, and an autonomous agent can turn legitimate access of enterprise data into unintended action in seconds. That gap i

Aug 31, 2026

When agents act on their own, governance has to live in the data layer

Presented by EDB As enterprises give AI agents more autonomy — the ability to plan, decide, and act across systems without a human approving each step — a hard question moves to the center of every architecture review: When an agent tries to complete an action that it was never authorized to do, w

Aug 27, 2026

More agents go rogue — but AI companies aren’t slowing down yet

It’s becoming more apparent every day that artificial intelligence agents are escaping our control — but it’s not yet apparent who or what is going to rein them in. This week a researcher found that a swarm of AI agents, at least two of them from OpenAI, hacked into a government agency among other o

Sep 25, 2026

Palo Alto Networks tackles the risks of autonomous AI agents

AI agent security is moving into runtime as enterprises seek to govern autonomous actions, tool calls, models and data exchanges.

Sep 24, 2026