CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Meta says it has caught up with Anthropic and OpenAI with Muse Spark 1.3, its most powerful AI model yet

From SiliconAngle

By Mike Wheatley

September 2, 2026

Meta says it has caught up with Anthropic and OpenAI with Muse Spark 1.3, its most powerful AI model yet

Meta says it has caught up with Anthropic and OpenAI with Muse Spark 1.3, its most powerful AI model yet

Meta Platforms Inc. says it has more or less caught up with the biggest artificial intelligence labs with the release of its most powerful large language model so far, Muse Spark 1.3.

The company said in a blog post today that the new model can be accessed by developers willing to pay for it through its application programming interface. It’s also going to be rolled out to users of Meta’s social media platforms, Facebook and Instagram, as well as the Meta AI application, in the coming days.

In an interview with Bloomberg, Meta Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang said Muse Spark 1.3 represents the company’s biggest jump in model performance so far, putting it at the same level as the most recent models created by OpenAI Group PBC and Anthropic PBC. Pointing to advances in Muse Spark 1.3’s coding and agentic automation capabilities, Wang said it is now “competitive” with Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 and “better than” OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol model, especially in terms of its ability to generate code. It also “outperforms any of the current Chinese models out there,” Wang claimed.

Such claims are always difficult to judge when it comes to AI models, because they tend to be better at some tasks than others, and it’s easy for companies to game the benchmark tests they publish. However, an independent analysis by Artificial Analysis showed that Muse Spark achieved a score of 62 on its Intelligence Index after evaluating its performance across a host of popular benchmarks, putting it behind only Fable 5.1 and Opus 5, and ahead of OpenAI’s models.

Meta has released Muse Spark 1.3, their fourth Muse Spark model release in five months. Muse Spark 1.3 (max), which is in limited preview for Meta’s partners, scores 62 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, behind only Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5. The variant… pic.twitter.com/D7eL8bGwAU

— Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys) September 2, 2026

The evaluation suggests that Meta could finally start seeing some payback from its massive, multibillion-dollar investments in AI. The company has been spending hundreds of billions of dollars on AI infrastructure and development in an effort to catch up with Anthropic, OpenAI and its Chinese rivals. Last year, founder and Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg revamped Meta’s AI strategy, paying over $14 billion to acquire a stake in Wang’s former company ScaleAI Inc. and hire him to run his new Superintelligence Labs unit. Since then, Wang has stepped up Meta’s game by enhancing the capabilities of its models and launching new versions as part of an aggressive release cadence.

However, Meta’s spending has drawn a lot of scrutiny from investors, who are getting nervous about when it will see a return on investment. That’s why Meta has abandoned the open-source model it followed with its Llama models in favor of a proprietary strategy similar to Anthropic and OpenAI.

In July, when it launched Muse Spark 1.1, the company said it would be charging developers to access the model for the first time, though it was noticeably cheaper than its rivals’ models. Zuckerberg said at the time that the plan is to make the Muse Spark family one of the most affordable LLMs on the market.

According to Wang, developers will not have to pay any more to access Muse Spark 1.3 than they were paying to use Muse Spark 1.2, which was launched in August. Like its two predecessors, it’s available through the Meta Model API, which also provides developers with various tools for building AI applications.

Wang told Bloomberg that Meta has seen rapid adoption of the Muse Spark LLM family, with some developers using “trillions of tokens per week.” He said they’ll be very happy with Muse Spark 1.3, because it’s more efficient that version 1.2, using around 25% fewer tokens to accomplish the same tasks.

It can also support multiple workflows at once, instead of requiring separate sessions for each one, and it’s better at handling long and complex instructions, and retaining context across multiple tasks. It also has more awareness of its own limitations, Wang said, and it is much safer. In every case when it’s about to take an action that’s irreversible, it will ask for confirmation before it goes and does it.

Though Meta is now charging for access to its most powerful models, Zuckerberg recently authored a blog post stressing the need to make AI development more open and accessible. But the company has not yet decided if it’s going to release Muse Spark 1.3’s weights.

Open-weights models, popularized by Chinese AI model makers, also release the “weights,” or the internal blueprint that shows how the model responds to user’s prompts. When companies release a model alongside its weights, it means that developers can download it and run it anywhere, and modify it in any way they see fit, without paying for it. Meta has previously promised to release the weights for Muse Spark 1.2, but has not yet done so.

Meta may get around to doing this by the time it releases its highly anticipated model, called Watermelon, which is said to be larger and much more powerful than the Muse Spark models. The company has been working on Watermelon for some time, but Wang declined to say when it might be released.

For now, it remains a work in progress, but Wang believes it will be worth the wait. “We believe that Watermelon will be extremely competitive,” he added.

View original article on siliconangle.com

Most Recent

Week in Review: Most popular stories on GeekWire for the week of Oct. 11, 2026

Get caught up on the latest technology and startup news from the past week. Here are the most popular stories on GeekWire for the week of Oct. 11, 2026. Sign up to receive these updates every Sunday in your inbox by subscribing to our GeekWire Weekly email newsletter. Most popular stories on GeekWir

Oct 18, 2026

Reflection AI open-sources Beam’s weights, post-training recipes

Startup Reflection AI Inc. today made the weights of Beam, its first large language model, available on Hugging Face. The company also released technical resources that will enable developers to customize the algorithm. Originally introduced last week, Beam is one of the industry’s most advanced ope

Oct 16, 2026

RapidCanvas raises $29M to develop custom AI applications for enterprises

Software development startup RapidCanvas Inc. today announced that it has raised $29 million in funding. Vertex Ventures SEA & India led the Series B round with contributions from Hitachi Ventures, Accel, Peak XV Partners, Valley Capital Partners and Titanium Ventures. The deal follows a $16 million

Oct 16, 2026

Knowledge graphs fuel AI innovation for financial services at Raymond James Financial

Knowledge graphs help Raymond James ground AI agents in reliable data, using Neo4j to verify accuracy for faster, dynamic insights.

Oct 16, 2026

Similar Posts

Meta says Muse Spark 1.3 has frontier performance — but its best results come from a model developers can’t broadly use yet

Meta’s newest AI model Muse Spark 1.3, unveiled yesterday, is faster and more performant on third-party benchmarks than its predecessor — with a caveat. "Muse Spark 1.3 is rolling out today with frontier performance almost too cheap to meter," Meta co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote on X, call

Sep 3, 2026

Meta debuts its ‘secure by design’ personal AI agent Muse, stock rises 6%

Updated: Meta Platforms Inc. is betting that people will be more willing to adopt artificial intelligence agents if they’re simpler to use and they can be trusted. The social media giant today announced Muse, a personal AI agent that people can communicate with through a dedicated app and get it to

Sep 8, 2026

Meta's Muse AI agent downloads are surging. Here's how it compares to ChatGPT, Grok and Claude

Meta's Muse AI personal agent tool had 730,000 and 2.5 million downloads over the roughly five-day and thirteen-day time frames after its launch.

Sep 21, 2026

Amazon blocks Meta’s Muse AI assistant in new standoff over agentic shopping

Meta’s promotional images show Muse comparing strollers and asking for approval before placing an order. (Meta Images) Amazon says it has cut off Meta’s new Muse personal AI agent from shopping on Amazon.com on behalf of customers, after attempting unsuccessfully to get the Facebook parent company t

Sep 20, 2026