CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy Policy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
AWS CloudWatch Omni goes after the hardest question in agentic AI: Why did the agent do that?

From SiliconAngle

By Zeus Kerravala

September 27, 2026

AWS CloudWatch Omni goes after the hardest question in agentic AI: Why did the agent do that?

AWS CloudWatch Omni goes after the hardest question in agentic AI: Why did the agent do that?

For decades, the observability industry has answered one basic question: Is it running? Agentic artificial intelligence breaks that model. An agent can return a clean response, meet its latency target and throw no errors, yet still give a customer the wrong answer, call the wrong tool or pull from a stale knowledge base.

By every traditional metric, the system is healthy, but the only metric that matters to the business is that it failed. That’s the gap Amazon Web Services Inc. is targeting with Amazon CloudWatch Omni (pictured), which became generally available last week. AWS positions Omni as the next generation of CloudWatch.

It’s app-centric, runs outside the AWS Management Console, is built on OpenTelemetry and embeds AI. This shifts observability from “Is it running?” to “Why did my agent do that?” I’d argue that’s the question standing between most enterprises and production-scale agentic AI. AWS cites an IDC forecast of more than 1 billion deployed agents by 2029. No operations team can manually review that much nondeterministic behavior.

Here are five considerations for information technology and business leaders:

Evaluation is the new monitoring

The most important part of Omni isn’t the dashboards; it’s the evaluation engine. Omni captures every trace and ships with 17 built-in evaluators that score coherence, helpfulness, faithfulness and routing correctness, among other metrics. Teams can compare prompt versions in a playground, build test datasets from production traffic, and automatically catch regressions. Evaluators can also run continuously against live traffic, so quality drift is flagged the same way a CPU spike would be. Latency and error rates can’t tell you whether an answer was right, but scoring can.

Sony is an early adopter. “At Sony, our enterprise-wide agentic AI platform now supports hundreds of proof-of-concept and production workloads,” said Masahiro Oba, senior general manager of the AI Acceleration Division at Sony. “At this scale, observability and evaluation are essential. With Amazon CloudWatch Omni, I can go from a single trace directly to evaluation, AI analysis, comparison or dataset creation.”

The key word in that statement is “hundreds.” Most companies I talk to aren’t stuck on building a single agent. They’re stuck on governing dozens or hundreds, each built by a different team with a different idea of what “good” looks like. Oba also noted that assembling evaluation datasets is often a business-side bottleneck, and that one-click dataset creation from live traces removes that bottleneck.

Getting out of the console is a bigger deal than it sounds

Developers get a native extension for Visual Studio Code, Cursor and Kiro, where traces appear as they run an agent locally, with no AWS account required. Operators get a standalone web experience with single sign-on via existing identity providers such as Okta and Microsoft Entra ID. Both share a single data layer, so the trace a developer debugs is the same one an operator investigates.

AWS acknowledges that its console is built for infrastructure administrators, not for the site reliability engineers, AI engineers and application owners who now carry operational responsibility. Meeting developers in the integrated development environment, where AI coding assistants such as Claude Code and Codex can set up instrumentation, shifts quality work to the point where problems are cheapest to fix.

The unified data layer is the real differentiator

Many startups can trace large language model calls. What’s interesting about Omni is that agent traces, application telemetry and infrastructure signals all live in the same CloudWatch data store. As a result, an investigation can start with an agent receiving a bad tool result, move to an application programming interface error from a capacity-limited service, and end with an exhausted database connection pool.

In most shops today, that’s three tools, three teams and a lot of meetings to connect the dots. AWS DevOps Agent is enabled by default in investigation sessions, correlating signals and maintaining a full investigation history.

Capital One was a design partner. “Capital One operates one of the largest observability footprints in financial services,” said Parvez Naqvi, managing vice president of cloud platform and resilience engineering at Capital One. “As a design partner for Amazon CloudWatch Omni, we helped shape a single AI-powered observability solution that will give our engineers topology-aware intelligence and natural-language querying across all telemetry from a single surface, with full data ownership through OpenTelemetry.”

For heavily regulated industries, such as banking, data portability is critical to success, and that requires data ownership. Captured investigation history is also underrated, since in regulated industries it’s audit evidence of how an AI incident was handled.

Open standards lower the lock-in bar but don’t eliminate it

Instrumentation runs on OpenInference and the AWS Distro for OpenTelemetry, whether agents run on AWS or in other clouds. Omni supports LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI, the OpenAI Agents SDK, Strands and the Vercel AI SDK, as well as third-party evaluators such as DeepEval. Amazon Bedrock AgentCore agents receive Omni automatically. Azure ingestion is supported today, with deeper multicloud coverage coming.

That openness is necessary in a crowded field. Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, Grafana Labs and Splunk are all expanding into agent observability, as are large language model-focused tools such as LangSmith and Arize AI.

OpenTelemetry makes the data portable, but the intelligence layer isn’t. The topology, evaluators, investigation history and DevOps Agent all run on AWS. Companies already heavily invested in AWS will see Omni as the natural default. Those running mature Datadog or Splunk estates across multiple clouds will likely use it for agent development and evaluation, while keeping their observability system of record where it is.

Pricing is built for adoption, so watch the telemetry bill

The IDE extension is free. Customers pay for the telemetry they send and store. Dashboards and alerts are free, and queries up to five times the monthly ingestion volume are included. Eligible accounts receive a 30-day trial and $1,000 in OpenTelemetry ingestion credits.

The catch is that agents are chatty. Every prompt, model call, tool invocation and sub-agent handoff generates a span. Multiply that across hundreds of workloads and continuous evaluation, and ingestion costs can outpace the AI budget that created them. DevOps Agent is also priced separately.

What this means for buyers

Omni is a comprehensive agent observability platform that addresses the trust gap that keeps agents in pilot mode. IT leaders should:

  • Define “good” before you buy the evaluator. Built-in scoring only helps if your business owners have documented what a correct, compliant and helpful answer looks like for each agent. Most haven’t.
  • Standardize instrumentation now. Put every agent pilot on OpenTelemetry, regardless of the backend. That keeps your options open and makes future platform decisions much easier.
  • Model telemetry costs at production scale. Set policies for sampling, retention and evaluation frequency before agents go live, not after the first bill arrives.
  • Decide where your system of record resides. If AWS is your primary cloud, Omni is a strong default choice. If you’re multicloud with an established observability platform, consider Omni for development and evaluation, and integrate it rather than replacing your existing setup.
  • Treat investigation history as part of governance. Integrate Omni’s captured investigation trail into AI risk and compliance processes, especially in regulated industries.

The industry spent a decade learning to observe distributed systems. Agentic AI requires observing decisions, not just systems, and AWS aims to own that layer for its customers. The companies that get the most out of it will be those that treat evaluation as an operational discipline, not a feature to be switched on.

Zeus Kerravala is a principal analyst at ZK Research, a division of Kerravala Consulting. He wrote this article for SiliconANGLE.

View original article on siliconangle.com

Most Recent

Fresh figures suggest Washington’s space industry has doubled its economic impact … again

The preliminary results of a study commissioned by Space Northwest, an association focused on regional space ventures, suggest that Washington state’s space economy contributes $8.1 billion in direct economic output annually. The newly reported figures show that the space industry’s economic impact

Sep 29, 2026

Low-energy chip startup Efficient Computer closes on $97M in funding

Low-energy chip startup Efficient Computer Co. said today it has closed on a $97 million round of funding in the second major investment it has picked up this year. The round was led by TQ Ventures and saw participation from Eclipse, Union Square Ventures, Giant Ventures, Triatomic Capital, TO Capit

Sep 29, 2026

Okta moves inline to police what AI agents actually do

An agent gateway lets Okta monitor AI agent actions inline and make real-time authorization decisions as identity security moves into the runtime path.

Sep 29, 2026

World model startup General Intuition closes $220M investment

General Intuition Inc. today announced that it has raised $220 million in funding at a $6.2 billion valuation. The capital was provided by Valor Equity Partners, Atreides, Seven Seven Six, Point72, Khosla Ventures and General Catalyst. The investment comes a year after General Intuition spun out of

Sep 29, 2026

Similar Posts

Identity and permissions aren’t enough to govern AI agent behavior

Presented by BoxIdentity and permissions are no longer enough to secure enterprise AI agents. They govern what an agent can reach, not how it behaves once it starts working on its own, and an autonomous agent can turn legitimate access of enterprise data into unintended action in seconds. That gap i

Aug 31, 2026

More agents go rogue — but AI companies aren’t slowing down yet

It’s becoming more apparent every day that artificial intelligence agents are escaping our control — but it’s not yet apparent who or what is going to rein them in. This week a researcher found that a swarm of AI agents, at least two of them from OpenAI, hacked into a government agency among other o

Sep 25, 2026

When agents act on their own, governance has to live in the data layer

Presented by EDB As enterprises give AI agents more autonomy — the ability to plan, decide, and act across systems without a human approving each step — a hard question moves to the center of every architecture review: When an agent tries to complete an action that it was never authorized to do, w

Aug 27, 2026

AI governance moves from observability to provable control

As artificial intelligence agents move from experimental tools into production systems, enterprise governance is being forced to answer a harder question. It is no longer enough to know what an agent did. Organizations increasingly need to prove what the agent was authorized to do, why it was allowe

Sep 19, 2026