CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy Policy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
In the AI era, identity evolves into the control plane for trust

From SiliconAngle

By Zeus Kerravala

September 29, 2026

In the AI era, identity evolves into the control plane for trust

In the AI era, identity evolves into the control plane for trust

Every major security shift ultimately comes down to one question: Who or what is allowed to do this?

For most of the past two decades, the answer was a person with a username and password. In the artificial intelligence era, the answer increasingly is an agent, and most organizations have no idea how many agents they have, what they can reach, or who is responsible for them.

This is the primary reason identity has become a critical, and some would argue the most important, layer in the AI security stack. Reflecting this, the theme of this year’s SailPoint Technologies Inc.’s Navigate conference is “AI, secured,” which I will be attending on October 5-8 in Austin, TX.

The identity math has changed

A tremendous amount of data supports the identity thesis.  As an example, Palo Alto Networks Inc.’s 2026 Identity Security Landscape report found that organizations now manage an average of 109 machine identities for every human identity, and companies expect AI agent identities to grow 85% over the next 12 months. The same research found that more than half of organizations can’t consistently enforce least-privilege access for service accounts across cloud, software-as-a-service and on-premises systems.

SailPoint’s own research is equally telling: Some 97% of AI agents have access to sensitive data, yet only 21% of organizations are highly confident they can manage AI agent security risks. Put those together, and you have an exploding population of highly privileged identities that almost nobody is governing well.

It’s important to note that the risk is real today. On SailPoint’s most recent earnings call, management described a proof-of-concept at a Fortune 500 company that uncovered more than 10,000 previously unknown AI agents and thousands of related risks. Shadow IT took years to spread, while shadow agents are spreading in months. A recent ZK Research data point found that almost half of AI use is on mobile devices, most of which information technology can’t see. As has been the case with every tech transition, if users do not get the experience they want from work tools, they will turn to consumer applications, and that’s happening today with AI.

Why identity, and why now

Much of the industry’s work on agent security has focused on containment: sandboxes, secure runtimes, guardrails, and, increasingly, hardware enforcement. That work is essential, but it doesn’t answer the most basic governance questions. A sandbox can prevent an agent from reaching the internet, but it can’t tell you who created that agent, whose authority it’s acting under, or whether it should still exist. For that, even the most sophisticated runtime must rely on an identity system.

In other words, every layer of agent security depends on the enterprise getting identity right. Containment tells you what an agent can’t do. Identity tells you who the agent is, who owns it, what it’s entitled to, and when that entitlement should end. You need both, but identity is the system of record everything else relies on.

Identity matters more for agents than it ever did for people for three reasons.

First, agents operate at machine speed. A human with excessive privileges might misuse them occasionally. An agent with excessive privileges can exercise them thousands of times an hour, and as the Hugging Face incident this summer showed, it can find paths no one anticipated.

Second, agents accumulate access. People change roles but retain permissions they no longer need; that’s a longstanding identity problem. Agents do the same thing faster, spawning sub-agents, borrowing credentials and combining permissions in ways no single policy anticipated.

Third, agents undermine accountability. When something goes wrong with a human account, there’s a person to call. With agents, the owner is often unclear, credentials are shared, and the logs point to a service account nobody remembers creating. SailPoint Chief Executive Mark McClain explained on the earnings call that enterprises need to know what data each agent can access, which human is accountable for that access, and how to revoke it when necessary. Those are the right three questions, and most companies can’t answer any of them today.

SailPoint’s bet on unified identity

SailPoint has leaned hard into this problem. In May, it launched Agentic Fabric, which discovers AI agents and machine identities, maps each to a human owner, and enforces real-time authorization. It became GA in August as part of a broader SailPoint Identity Security solution that pairs it with Human Fabric, the evolution of its Identity Security Cloud, on the Atlas platform. Capabilities include endpoint and browser sensors that expose hidden agents, Model Context Protocol servers, inline redaction of personal data before it reaches large language models, and a centralized kill switch for rogue agents.

I met with SailPoint President Matt Mills at BlackHat, and we discussed the product’s importance. He explained, “You cannot secure what you cannot see, or what you cannot tie back to accountability.” It’s the latter part of his statement that’s most important, because visibility without ownership just creates a longer list of problems.

What to watch at SailPoint Navigate

SailPoint Navigate is coming up next week, and here’s what I’ll be looking for:

  • Proof in production. Agentic Fabric has been generally available for about two months. I want to hear from customers about how many agents they found, how they assigned ownership and what they shut down.
  • Interoperability with the agent stack. Identity has to integrate with runtimes such as OpenShell, cloud agent platforms and developer tools. SailPoint’s recent Cursor connector is a good start, but the ecosystem should expand.
  • Just-in-time access for agents. Standing privilege is the enemy. I’ll be watching how far SailPoint pushes toward zero standing privilege for nonhuman identities.
  • Speed of governance. Quarterly access reviews don’t work for identities created and destroyed in minutes. Governance has to become continuous and largely automated.

Recommendations for IT pros

Regardless of which vendor an organization chooses to use, this is where the focus for identity should be:

  • Inventory every agent. You can’t govern what you can’t see. Run discovery across cloud, software-as-a-service, endpoints and browsers, and expect the number to be much higher than you think.
  • Assign a human owner to every agent. No agent should exist without a named person accountable for it. Disable unowned agents by default.
  • Eliminate standing privileges. Move agents to just-in-time, scoped access that expires when the task is complete. Never embed long-lived keys or tokens in agent code.
  • Govern humans and machines together. Agents often act on people’s behalf. Managing them in separate tools creates blind spots, so bring human, machine and agent identities into a single governance model.
  • Build and test a kill switch. Know exactly how you would revoke an agent’s access and credentials in seconds and practice it before you need to.
  • Connect identity to enforcement. Ensure your identity platform feeds your agent runtimes, network controls and security operations tools so policy is enforced wherever the agent goes.

Final thoughts

The industry has spent the past few years debating whether AI is safe, and that discussion has reached a crescendo over the past couple of months. The more practical question for IT leaders is whether they know who and what is operating within their environment. Identity has always been foundational to security, but in the AI era it becomes the control plane for trust.

Companies that treat agents as first-class identities can scale AI with confidence. Those that don’t will eventually learn the hard way what their agents have been doing. Navigate should give us a good read on how ready the industry and SailPoint are for that shift.

 Zeus Kerravala is a principal analyst at ZK Research, a division of Kerravala Consulting. He wrote this article for SiliconANGLE.

Photo: SailPoint

View original article on siliconangle.com

Most Recent

World model startup General Intuition closes $220M investment

General Intuition Inc. today announced that it has raised $220 million in funding at a $6.2 billion valuation. The capital was provided by Valor Equity Partners, Atreides, Seven Seven Six, Point72, Khosla Ventures and General Catalyst. The investment comes a year after General Intuition spun out of

Sep 29, 2026

OpenAI’s GPT-6.1 Sol delivers Astra-like performance at a dramatically lower price

Just a day after OpenAI Group PBC said it’s unwilling to release its latest model GPT-6.1 Astra on concerns over its safety, it has released a newer, almost as powerful model called GPT-6.1 Sol, which promises to deliver Astra-like performance at a much lower cost. The new model, announced at OpenAI

Sep 29, 2026

EliseAI raises $350M to enhance its AI work automation suite

EliseAI, a startup that develops artificial intelligence tools for real-estate companies and healthcare providers, has raised $350 million in funding. Andreessen Horowitz and Bessemer jointly led the round. EliseAI said today that they were joined by Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, Sapphire Ventures

Sep 29, 2026

Equals Money lets customers’ AI tools read data but not move money

MCP server access lets Equals Money customers retrieve data quickly without initiating payments, while the fintech governs AI agents like human staff.

Sep 29, 2026

Similar Posts

World model startup General Intuition closes $220M investment

General Intuition Inc. today announced that it has raised $220 million in funding at a $6.2 billion valuation. The capital was provided by Valor Equity Partners, Atreides, Seven Seven Six, Point72, Khosla Ventures and General Catalyst. The investment comes a year after General Intuition spun out of

Sep 29, 2026

OpenAI’s GPT-6.1 Sol delivers Astra-like performance at a dramatically lower price

Just a day after OpenAI Group PBC said it’s unwilling to release its latest model GPT-6.1 Astra on concerns over its safety, it has released a newer, almost as powerful model called GPT-6.1 Sol, which promises to deliver Astra-like performance at a much lower cost. The new model, announced at OpenAI

Sep 29, 2026

OpenAI’s Codex gets reusable cloud environments that follow developers across devices

OpenAI Group PBC today rolled out reusable cloud environments for its Codex coding agent, giving developers a saved project configuration they can work from across devices. Announced at the company’s DevDay conference, the release targets the preparation that comes before an agent writes a line of c

Sep 29, 2026

EliseAI raises $350M to enhance its AI work automation suite

EliseAI, a startup that develops artificial intelligence tools for real-estate companies and healthcare providers, has raised $350 million in funding. Andreessen Horowitz and Bessemer jointly led the round. EliseAI said today that they were joined by Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, Sapphire Ventures

Sep 29, 2026