CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Privacy FAQ

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Pentagon stops using Anthropic AI tools months after blacklisting company, BBC told

From BBC Tech

October 5, 2026

Pentagon stops using Anthropic AI tools months after blacklisting company, BBC told

Pentagon stops using Anthropic AI tools months after blacklisting company, BBC told
21 minutes ago
Kali Hays,Technology reporter in San Franciscoand
Daniel Bush,Washington correspondent

The US Department of Defence is no longer using Anthropic's AI tools, an official has told the BBC, months after it designated the company a supply chain risk on national security grounds.

The Pentagon "has ceased the use of Anthropic products", the department official said in a statement.

Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth labelled Anthropic a supply chain risk in February, and announced that the Pentagon would stop using it by late August.

But multiple people familiar with the matter told the BBC that as recently as last week Anthopic's Claude model was still used by the department in research, analysis and intelligence gathering as well as in military operations against Iran.

It was viewed as a critical tool for sorting through vast quantities of information, the people said. They include former US defence officials and contractors who have worked closely with the Pentagon specifically on AI.

A spokesman for Anthropic declined to comment when asked about the Pentagon's statement.

The details of the defence department stopping all use of Anthropic's tools have not been previously reported.

Anthropic had been used by the US government and military since 2024 and was the first advanced AI company to have its tools deployed in government agencies doing classified work.

But earlier this year, the Pentagon pressed it to remove its safety guardrails from Claude and give the military unfettered access to its AI tools.

When Anthropic refused, citing concerns of mass surveillance and autonomous weapons, Hegseth designated the company a "national security supply-chain risk" - a law typically reserved for companies based in countries that pose a threat to the US.

Anthropic said the move was "unprecedented and unlawful" and has sued the Trump administration in an effort to overturn the designation.

Trump administration illegally retaliated against Anthropic, judge rules

Anthropic sues US government for calling it a risk

Anthropic blocks possible attempt to use AI to make biological weapons

Anthropic boss Dario Amodei calls for AI development to slow down

As this legal fight has played out in the courts, the Pentagon has signed contracts with other major tech companies, including Google, xAI and OpenAI.

OpenAI tools have been more widely adopted in recent months in some military departments, according to two people familiar with AI use in the defence department

The Pentagon's statement to the BBC on Monday came after multiple people said in interviews that Claude was still being widely used in recent weeks.

It was embedded in a larger data platform used by the Pentagon called Maven Smart System, multiple sources said.

Maven, which is operated by Palantir, is the Pentagon's primary platform for organising intelligence and other data.

Lauren Kahn, a senior research analyst at Georgetown's Center for Security and Emerging Technology said that because Claude was deeply integrated into Maven it would have been difficult to remove it quickly from the system.

"The fact that it took the Pentagon until now to remove all use of Claude from across the system is indicative that these things are not just plug and play," she said.

"Once they become integrated it can be painful to remove them," added Kahn, a former US defence official.

The BBC spoke with defence contractors who specialise in AI and have worked closely with the Pentagon, as well as former US defence officials and others familiar with the Pentagon's use of artificial intelligence. Several spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak to the media.

When Hegseth initially ordered Anthropic to be phased out of government, "there was concern with moving beyond Anthropic to OpenAI" and other tools, a former senior US defence official said.

Hegseth set a six-month deadline to phase out Anthropic on 27 February, one day before the US and Israel attacked Iran.

Pentagon employees continued to use Anthropic's Claude tools, including its powerful Mythos models, "throughout the whole period of the controversy" with the company, one of the people said.

Claude was used in particular for intelligence gathering and analysis, including through Palantir's Maven system, several sources said. Palantir, a leading defence tech firm, was founded by the billionaire ally of President Donald Trump, Peter Thiel.

Sources familiar with the way the technology is used said analysts and other defence officials rely on Maven to access and organise visual data, including satellite imagery and drone footage.

The data was then fed into Claude and other large language models for tasks such as identifying potential military targets.

Officials frequently used the technology when compiling one-page briefs that were passed up the chain of command, according to a source who was given a demonstration of Maven by Palantir earlier this year.

Recent private demonstrations of Maven for government officials have also included Claude, another person familiar with Maven said.

The Maven system is deployed "across the entire department", Cameron Stanley, who leads AI work within the defence department, said during a demonstration of Maven earlier this year.

Maven is also used by some US allies to share intelligence with the Trump administration.

A current defence department official touted Maven's role in intelligence sharing in the war with Iran during a private briefing with industry leaders in Washington last week, according to a former US official who participated in the meeting.

Anthropic's clash with the Pentagon comes as relations with the White House appear to be warming. Trump met with Anthropic boss Dario Amodei twice at the White House last week.

After one of the meetings with Trump and other technology leaders, Amodei said he still had concerns about risks posed by AI.

"How we address those risks is still under discussion," Amodei told reporters at the White House, as Trump stood by his side, but "if we work with the president, we can win safely".

Trump then proceeded to praise Amodei, saying he was "great" and "fantastic."

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.

Artificial intelligence
White House
Donald Trump
United States
Military

View original article on bbc.com

Most Recent

SpaceX stock climbs to highest since June, returning Musk to trillionaire status

SpaceX shares have bounced almost 60% off their low in early August, boosted by the company's AI business and Starship progress.

Oct 5, 2026

CFTC proposes new federal framework for leveraged retail crypto trading

The agency floated a new “crypto asset market” exchange category but said it can't require crypto to trade on CFTC platforms without Congress.

Oct 5, 2026

Meta, TikTok, and X challenge UK's Ofcom over the amount of info it is demanding under the Online Safety Act, saying it creates unprecedented regulatory burdens

Meta (META.O), TikTok and X are challenging British regulator Ofcom over the amount of information it is demanding …

Oct 5, 2026

Valon Hits $2.3 Billion Valuation To Bring AI To America’s $13 Trillion Mortgage Market

The U.S. mortgage market is massive, but its payment systems are antiquated and often analog. Valon raised a $150 million Series D …

Oct 5, 2026

Similar Posts

Enabling independent research on how people use Claude

Earlier this year, we ran a pilot giving external researchers access to aggregate, real-world Claude usage data. Three research groups designed their own studies for Anthropic Insights, our privacy-preserving analysis tool. In this post, we share high-level results from those studies and what we lea

Aug 27, 2026

Judge blocks Pentagon blacklist of Anthropic as supply chain risk

The Defense Department had barred the U.S. military from using Anthropic's Claude in March

Aug 27, 2026

U.S. appeals court upholds Pentagon designation of Anthropic as supply chain risk

A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Friday upheld the Pentagon's blacklisting of Anthropic, a blow to the artificial intelligence company in its months-long battle with the Trump administration. In a 2-1 decision, Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas and Circuit Judge Neomi Rao rejected Anthropi

Sep 25, 2026

Chinese AI labs secretly used millions of Claude exchanges to train their models, Anthropic says

Anthropic said it detected unauthorized efforts by China-based AI labs including Alibaba and Moonshot AI to use its Claude models to help improve their own AI systems.

Sep 10, 2026