CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Google's new image model Nano Banana 2.1 generates better images for less money

From The Decoder

By Matthias Bastian

October 6, 2026

Google's new image model Nano Banana 2.1 generates better images for less money

Google's new image model Nano Banana 2.1 generates better images for less money
Matthias Bastian View the LinkedIn Profile of Matthias Bastian
Oct 6, 2026
Nano Banana Pro prompted by THE DECODER

Google has released Nano Banana 2.1, a new model for image generation and editing.

It replaces Nano Banana 2, released in February 2026, and Google says it improves on previous versions "across the board." Nano Banana Pro likely remains Google's best image model, but it uses the most recent Pro model, 3.1, while 2.1 uses Gemini 3.6 Flash. The next major gain in image quality could come with Google's announced Pro model, Gemini 4 Argon.

Google is also cutting prices roughly in half compared with Nano Banana 2. A 1K image costs 3.36 cents, down from 6.70 cents, while a 4K image drops from 15.10 to 7.56 cents. Nano Banana Pro costs considerably more at 13.40 cents per 1K image.

Model 0.5K 1K 2K 4K
Nano Banana 2.1 - 3.36 5.04 7.56
Nano Banana 2 / Gemini 3.1 Flash Image 4.50 6.70 10.10 15.10
Nano Banana 2 Lite / Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image - 3.36 - -
Nano Banana Pro / Gemini 3 Pro Image - 13.40 13.40 24.00
Nano Banana / Gemini 2.5 Flash Image - 3.90 - -

According to Google, version 2.1 improves visual quality, text rendering, character consistency across conversation turns, wide panoramas, and infographics. It can process up to 14 reference images at once, keeping up to four characters and ten objects consistent. The model also connects to Google Search and offers minimal, medium, and high thinking levels that affect image quality.

Ad

Although 2.1 sometimes beats Pro by a wide margin in benchmarks, Nano Banana 2 also matched it in those tests. In practice, Nano Banana Pro often still produces noticeably better images. Google describes 2.1 as "the more efficient counterpart" to Pro.

Benchmark Nano Banana 2.1 (Thinking) Nano Banana 2.1 (No Thinking) Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Gemini 3 Pro Image
Text-to-Image
Overall Preference 1050 ± 14 1015 ± 13 990 ± 7 935 ± 8
Infographic Design 1048 ± 17 1001 ± 17 961 ± 12 912 ± 12
Infographic Accuracy 0.521 0.328 0.179 0.265
Editing
General Editing 1026 ± 12 980 ± 15 938 ± 11 939 ± 10
Single-Character Consistency 1028 ± 14 1021 ± 14 981 ± 10 991 ± 9
Multi-Character Consistency 1106 ± 14 1068 ± 14 978 ± 10 1011 ± 10
Mask/Ink-Based Editing 1049 ± 15 1042 ± 16 965 ± 12 927 ± 12
Product Consistency 1024 ± 18 981 ± 18 955 ± 22 965 ± 14
Stylization 1062 ± 20 1036 ± 17 991 ± 12 990 ± 12
Multi-Reference Editing 1066 ± 22 1041 ± 20 988 ± 13 989 ± 12

The model runs at Flash-tier speed, supports 1K, 2K, and 4K resolutions, and is already rolling out across Google's products. These include the Gemini app, AI Mode in Google Search, Google AI Studio, Flow by Google, Stitch by Google, Google Ads, and the Gemini Enterprise Platform.

More details are available in the model card. Google will shut down the previous model, "gemini-3.1-flash-image," on October 29, 2026.

Ad

AI News Without the Hype – Curated by Humans

Subscribe to THE DECODER for ad-free reading, a weekly AI newsletter, our exclusive "AI Radar" frontier report six times a year, full archive access, and access to our comment section.

Subscribe now
Source: Google / Nano Banana 2.1 | Deepmind / Model Card | Google AI / Deprecations

View original article on the-decoder.com

Most Recent

Musk Says SpaceX Will Sometimes Use Rival Models to Power Grok Bot

Elon Musk announced on Tuesday night that SpaceX’s AI unit will now use some AI models from competitors to power Grok Bot, signaling a shift away from relying exclusively on models developed in-house. “Going forward, @SpaceX will use the best back end model for any given task, including Claude Opus

Oct 7, 2026

Amazon Ring’s First Smart Lock Has a Clever Solution for Battery Anxiety

Amazon.com Inc.’s Ring brand unveiled its first smart lock, with an innovative feature that addresses the dreaded scenario of arriving home to a dead battery.

Oct 7, 2026

Google's new SynthID website can identify AI-generated media

Google on Tuesday launched a new site that lets anyone verify whether a piece of media, be it an image, a video or an audio clip, is generated using AI.

Oct 7, 2026

A Taiwan union representing Micron workers says it has secured member authorization to strike over the company's bonus scheme; the details are under discussion

A Taiwan union representing workers at Micron Technology (MU.O) said on Wednesday it had secured authorisation from its members …

Oct 7, 2026

Similar Posts

Gemini 3.8 text-to-speech says hello

Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS and Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS are our most expressive audio models yet.

Sep 23, 2026

Google Gemini 4 Argon closes the gap with OpenAI and Anthropic but doesn't take a clear lead

Gemini 4 Argon is Google's first frontier model in over seven months. It matches GPT-6 Astra in independent testing but can't keep up with Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5. The per-token price is low, but Argon burns through more than twice as many tokens per task as Astra. Select testers get access firs

Sep 30, 2026

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash lets you build with more control

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash brings a new suite of creative controls and generative video capabilities to developers.

Aug 27, 2026

Google launches two Gemini 3.8 models with cutting-edge reasoning capabilities

Just three weeks after its last large language model release, Google LLC today launched Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber. The two LLMs are based on the same technical foundation. The primary difference is that Gemini 3.8 Flash is a general-purpose model while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is des

Sep 2, 2026