CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Opinion: Washington’s new state income tax must be repealed

From GeekWire

By Matt McIlwain

October 7, 2026

Opinion: Washington’s new state income tax must be repealed

Opinion: Washington’s new state income tax must be repealed

Editor’s note: GeekWire publishes guest opinions to highlight a range of perspectives on issues shaping the tech and startup community. To submit a guest column, email tips@geekwire.com.

This fall, Washington state voters will once again have to defend their economic future and core competitive edge by voting yes on Initiative 645 to repeal the state income tax.

Earlier this year, state lawmakers established the new state income tax. Supporters claim that this tax will only impact higher-income earners. But the measure includes broad new income taxing powers that make every Washingtonian and those doing business in the state a target.

How do we know this? Legislators have made it clear by their actions — and actions speak louder than words!

Most notably, the income tax was written specifically to cover pensions, reversing Washington’s previous commitment to not tax pension retirement income. While teacher, firefighter and other pensioners are not initially paying the state income tax, the only reason to make their income subject to the tax is to require them to pay when it is lowered to apply to them.

Second, Olympia actually voted twice on the income tax — once to pass the income tax, and a second time to ensure they could expand it to everyone. They wanted to make clear their intent to voters.

Finally, the income tax is already driving people out of the state, which will result in lower tax revenues. We can be confident that Sen. Jamie Pedersen (who has stated publicly that he supports a universal income tax on all Washingtonians) and the Legislature will use that shortfall as justification to apply the tax to many more Washingtonians. So, unless you vote yes on I-645, you can expect to pay the income tax soon.

Even the state’s most prominent Democrats are calling out Olympia’s runaway spending. Former Gov. Christine Gregoire told Washington business leaders recently that Olympia has “a spending problem, not a revenue problem,” noting the state budget has grown from $33 billion to $80 billion since she left office. Former Gov. Gary Locke, similarly, called Olympia’s spending “out of control.”

“Washington cannot afford to follow the path of states like New York and Oregon, where out-of-control spending leads to higher taxes and an increasingly difficult climate for families and businesses.”

Two Democratic governors, sounding the same alarm, should tell legislators to focus on spending cuts, not tax increases. But, instead of looking for savings, Washington’s political leaders passed the largest tax and spending increase ($9.3 billion) in state history in 2025, and then followed it up with another $2.3 billion spending increase in 2026.

The pattern is as clear in Washington as it is in other states that are falling behind competitively: no matter how much citizens hand over in taxes, legislators always think it’s never enough. Giving lawmakers even more of our tax dollars when they have failed to responsibly manage what they have hurts everyone in the state.

Beyond the impact to personal paychecks, there are two long-term consequences that will negatively impact voters — whether they pay the tax or not.

First, job creators and job opportunities are leaving the state. National IRS migration data already shows high earners leaving high-tax states at an accelerating rate. Washington ranks sixth highest in the nation for losing higher-income residents, and a state income tax will accelerate this trend. A 2026 Association of Washington Business survey found nearly 1 in 4 Washington employers are now considering relocating out of state, nearly triple the rate from just a year earlier.

Companies such as Starbucks, moving a large share of its corporate workforce to Nashville, are shifting operations and jobs out of the state in response to the increasingly hostile tax climate and the costs of doing business. Sadly, the result is that Washington has an unemployment rate hovering near 5%, tied for sixth highest in the country and nearly a full percentage point above the national average.

Second, avoiding the tax effectively means cutting all ties to Washington. Under the new law, it appears taxpayers can only shed their Washington domicile by spending 30 days or fewer in the state a year and selling their home. It’s no surprise active home listings are up an average 27% in much of Washington this year.

This rule is also an existential threat for the state’s largest nonprofits, as financial advisors are already telling clients the “gold standard” for anyone trying to sever ties is to stop philanthropic giving in Washington entirely.

The last time Washingtonians voted on an income tax was in 2010. That income tax proposal, I-1098, was rejected by a 64%-36% voting margin. Companies including Microsoft, Boeing and Expedia, as well as the founders of Amazon and T-Mobile, supported the effort to stop the income tax. They were right to do so for the benefit of their employees and the citizens of Washington.

In the years since, economic growth and investment enabled the state spending budget to dramatically increase from under $30 billion to more than $80 billion without an income tax. Washington cannot afford to follow the path of states like New York and Oregon, where out-of-control spending leads to higher taxes and an increasingly difficult climate for families and businesses. We need a state that can compete!

This November, voters have the opportunity to send a message to politicians by doing what they have done time and again: vote yes on I-645 to repeal the state income tax and help Washington succeed for generations to come.

View original article on geekwire.com

Most Recent

Infor combines industry expertise and embedded engineers for process automation

Infor combines industry expertise, AI agents and forward-deployed engineers to help customers implement process automation and prototype new use cases.

Oct 7, 2026

Walmart prepares to take off in Amazon’s backyard with Seattle-area drone delivery in 2027

Walmart looks like it might beat Amazon to the skies over the Seattle area as the retail giant announced this week that it plans to bring automated drone delivery to the region in 2027. The move is part of a broader nationwide push by Walmart and drone operator Wing — a subsidiary of Google parent A

Oct 7, 2026

Kore.ai launches Autoloop to keep tuning enterprise AI agents after they go live

Enterprise artificial intelligence platform company Kore.ai Inc. today launched Autoloop, an optimization engine for the AI agents that customers build on its Kore.ai Agent Platform. Businesses set the targets, and Autoloop keeps adjusting the agents to hit them automatically, including after they’r

Oct 7, 2026

OneSpan Sign takes aim at the slow work around bank agreements

Authentication and digital agreements company OneSpan Inc. today unveiled new and planned features for its OneSpan Sign electronic signature service that go beyond the signing step. The update is aimed at the parts of the agreement process that slow down banks and other financial institutions. Elect

Oct 7, 2026

Similar Posts

Seattle economic study finds strong tech assets, a risky concentration, and a tax that ‘penalizes’ hiring

An independent study commissioned by the City of Seattle says the city should protect the big tech employers it has while building a more diverse economy on top of them. The 127-page report also says Seattle's tax structure is unique among its peers in penalizing the hiring of senior, high-compensat

Sep 10, 2026

‘The warning signs are flashing’: New regional partnership calls for cohesive Seattle-area tech strategy

Regional leaders from four counties launched the Partnership for a Competitive Puget Sound, a 20-point plan responding to the loss of nearly 7,000 jobs last year. The group's report says the Seattle area's technology industry has no coordinated strategy of its own.

Sep 14, 2026

Seattle’s tax burden shifted to business as jobs slipped away, new report finds

Seattle’s tax collections have nearly tripled over the past decade, soaring from $900 million in 2013 to a projected $2.8 billion in 2026. But who pays those taxes, and how the tax revenue is collected, looks vastly different today than a decade ago. A new report released by ECOnorthwest, commission

Oct 5, 2026

‘I’m not sure we’d make the same decision’: A rocket maker’s reality check for the Seattle region

Making the entrepreneurial leap is hard enough, let alone launching a company into orbit. Andy Lapsa gave up a well-paying job, spent his family’s nest egg and went 15 months before paying himself half his old salary to get Stoke Space off the ground. He said Stoke chose Washington state for its wor

Sep 29, 2026