CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Rising Costs Threaten Notebook Demand in 2027, Raising Risks of Shipment Declines and Price Increases, Says TrendForce

From TrendForce

October 9, 2026

Rising Costs Threaten Notebook Demand in 2027, Raising Risks of Shipment Declines and Price Increases, Says TrendForce

Rising Costs Threaten Notebook Demand in 2027, Raising Risks of Shipment Declines and Price Increases, Says TrendForce
8 October 2026 Consumer Electronics TrendForce

TrendForce's latest notebook industry research reveals that the primary risk facing the market in 2027 is expected to shift from supply constraints to the impact of rising costs on demand. Global notebook shipments are currently projected to decline by a low-single-digit percentage in 2027. 

However, if DRAM and CPU prices remain elevated, brands may be forced to pass more of these costs on to consumers. These higher retail prices could further extend replacement cycles, potentially pushing the full-year shipment decline into the high-single-digit range.

In 2026, improved CPU availability, early procurement by brands, and the pull-forward of some replacement demand helped support notebook shipments. However, this does not indicate a meaningful recovery in end-market demand. 

With some purchases originally expected in the second half of 2026 and beyond already brought forward, replacement momentum in subsequent periods is likely to weaken. Furthermore, as lower-cost inventories are gradually depleted, brands will face more direct pressure from rising CPU, DRAM, and SSD prices.

TrendForce notes that for a mainstream notebook with a manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP) of US$900, CPU, DRAM, and SSD components accounted for approximately 68% of the bill of materials (BOM) cost in 3Q26. This highlights the growing influence of core component costs on product pricing.

Brands consequently face difficult trade-offs. Raising retail prices risks weakening demand, while absorbing higher costs would squeeze gross margins. Alternatively, reducing specifications such as memory capacity to control BOM costs could undermine product competitiveness. 

In 2027, brands are therefore unlikely to be able to maintain pricing, specifications, and profitability simultaneously. The extent to which they pass higher costs on to consumers will be a key factor shaping demand.

Higher costs in emerging manufacturing locations prompt brands to reassess production strategies

Against this backdrop, notebook brands may reconsider production strategies previously adjusted to mitigate geopolitical risks. If tariff pressures do not intensify further, the factors guiding manufacturing glocalization are likely to shift from minimizing policy risks toward production costs, supply-chain completeness, and operational efficiency.

With component prices remaining elevated, the additional logistics, component sourcing, and supply-chain management costs associated with emerging manufacturing locations will come under greater scrutiny. This could encourage brands to relocate some capacity previously established outside China for risk diversification back to the country.

TrendForce estimates that the share of global notebook production outside China will decline from approximately 24% in 2025 to 21% in 2026, potentially falling below 20% in 2027. This suggests that brands are reassessing the balance between supply-chain diversification and manufacturing efficiency as policy and cost conditions evolve.

In 2027, supply conditions for notebook components may become more uneven. DRAM supply is likely to stay tight as AI server applications continue to absorb advanced-process capacity, while PC DRAM faces the risk of limited supply growth. Conversely, NAND Flash supply constraints might ease in the second half of 2027 with new capacity coming online. 

Outside memory, components like PCBs, MLCCs, and PMICs are also under pressure due to capacity allocation decisions, raw material costs, and geopolitical issues. These challenges could result in higher prices or longer lead times, increasing brands’ cost burdens and complicating supply-chain management.

TrendForce indicates that the focus of the notebook market in 2027 will shift from whether sufficient components are available to whether consumers can absorb higher prices. If brands can mitigate the impact on retail prices by adjusting product mixes and specifications while absorbing some of the additional costs, the shipment decline could remain in the low-single-digit range.

Conversely, if component costs continue to rise and are fully passed on to consumers, demand could weaken further, pushing the full-year shipment decline into the high-single-digit range. Brands’ ability to strike a new balance among pricing, specifications, supply stability, and profitability will be critical to stabilizing the notebook market in 2027.

For more information on TrendForce’s display reports and market data, please visit the Report Page, leave a Message, or Email (DR_MI@trendforce.com) the Sales Department. For more on the latest technology industry news and trends, please visit News.
Next Article
Six Leading Suppliers Bet on VCSEL NPO; VCSEL Demand Projected to Reach 650 Million Units by 2031, Says TrendForce

View original article on trendforce.com

Most Recent

Céline Dion, Harry Styles Use L-Acoustics AI-Powered Tech For Better Live Sound

New software from L-Acoustics helps isolate a singer's voice to cut through concert noise

Oct 14, 2026

AI agents are on a shopping spree: Total transactions on Base blockchain eclipse 138 million, Chainalysis finds

The field of agentic commerce, which describes the use of AI agents to carry out internet transactions, is rapidly maturing, and crypto is fueling the boom.

Oct 14, 2026

Global Smartphone Shipments Drop Record High of 22% in Q3 2026 as the Memory Crisis Hits Hard, According to IDC

Global smartphone shipments fell 22% to 255.3M units in 3Q26, a record drop driven by memory costs. IDC expects no recovery before 2028.

Oct 14, 2026

Exclusive | Bloomberg Doubles Down on Conversational AI

Allowing users to add their own information to the company's generative AI-based ASKB interface will feed the system with a new level of context

Oct 14, 2026

Similar Posts

PC Market Woes Continue: Shipments Fall 20.1% in Q3 2026 as Pull-In Hangover and Supply Constraints Bite

Seasonal third quarter lift fails to materialize after vendors and channels front-loaded inventory ahead of price hikes

Oct 9, 2026

RAM supply set to worsen, says Micron, as CEO celebrates ‘much higher’ prices

Posts huge leaps in revenue, profit, and margin, with more to come

Sep 30, 2026

Exclusive: Trump administration orders Kalshi to scrap AI price tracker over national security concerns

The futures market for computer power lets buyers and sellers lock in prices, and gives traders a way to bet on where those prices go.

Sep 15, 2026

A Stealth Startup Thinks It Just Hacked the Memory Shortage

Kepler Computing claims a new approach to chip design—and a proprietary material—can help end the supply bottlenecks that have sent memory prices surging.

Sep 9, 2026