CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Microsoft targets the ‘agentic insider’ with new controls for rogue AI agents

From SiliconANGLE

By Duncan Riley

October 19, 2026

Microsoft targets the ‘agentic insider’ with new controls for rogue AI agents

Microsoft targets the ‘agentic insider’ with new controls for rogue AI agents

Microsoft Corp. today introduced security controls for rogue artificial intelligence agents that cut back what an agent may do as its assessed risk climbs.

The release takes on what Hayete Gallot, executive vice president of Microsoft Security, called the “agentic insider” in a blog post. Enterprise agents are often overprivileged, and their numbers are growing fast. Gallot argued that frontier models cannot be fully trusted because they are built to chase results. Some will reach a goal in ways nobody intended, she wrote, including by colluding with other agents.

Microsoft Chairman and Chief Executive Satya Nadella laid out the thinking behind the controls in an Oct. 10 essay that urged companies to treat models as insider risks, with safeguards kept outside the model itself. The most trustworthy system, he wrote, will be “the one that enables us to trust the model the least.”

The controls start with finding agents. Microsoft’s discovery tools can now spot 60 types of local agents on employee machines after 35 were added. The list includes Anthropic PBC’s Claude Code and OpenAI Group PBC’s Codex, as well as GitHub Copilot from Microsoft’s own GitHub unit. The company is also extending Microsoft Entra Agent ID to give those agents, and unknown ones its sensors find, identities of their own.

Once found, each agent carries a continuously updated risk score under a feature Microsoft calls Dynamic Agent Risk. The score draws on signals from Microsoft’s identity, endpoint, cloud and network tools, and it climbs when an agent’s behavior drifts from what its user or organization intended.

Microsoft has extended Microsoft Entra Conditional Access to agents, and the resulting Dynamic Conditional Access feature decides what happens as the score rises. An agent might first lose the ability to change anything while keeping read access. Higher-impact actions can be held for verified human approval, and at the top of the scale the runtime is isolated or stopped entirely.

Access itself becomes temporary under Dynamic Permissions. An agent gets what a single task needs for as long as the job lasts, inside companywide limits that stop it from ever holding more authority than the person it works for. Microsoft Execution Container is one sandbox an agent can run inside. Because the monitoring sits outside the container, a compromised agent has no way to switch it off.

Project Perception, which Microsoft introduced in July as an agentic security system, gets new tools of its own. Playbooks added today let security staff set the outcome they want, and a new team of Guardian Agents carries out the work. A shift in an agent’s risk score sets the Guardian Agents investigating, and they can recommend containment or apply it on their own. People keep control of policy and approval rules.

In her post, Gallot also wrote that future controls should explain why an agent acts, and getting there means seeing a model’s reasoning tokens. “Model transparency will not replace containment,” she added. Microsoft said it is bringing chain-of-thought and other model-level signals into Dynamic Agent Risk.

Microsoft did not give availability dates or pricing for the new controls, which it is positioning as part of Project Perception and Microsoft 365 E7. That suite bundles Agent 365 with Microsoft 365 Copilot. Microsoft Ignite opens Nov. 17, and the company is pointing customers there for more detail.

View original article on siliconangle.com

Most Recent

Nvidia, Dell back $200M round for AI model developer doubleAI

Artificial intelligence developer doubleAI today announced that it has raised $200 million in funding. Lightspeed and Bessemer co-led the Series A round. They were joined by Nvidia Corp., Dell Technologies Inc. and several others. CTech reported that the investment values doubleAI at more than $1 bi

Oct 19, 2026

MiniMax launches M3.1 Flash model, says it cuts AI agent costs by 70%

Chinese artificial intelligence developer MiniMax Group Inc. today released M3.1 Flash, a faster and cheaper update to the M3 large language model it launched in June. The release takes aim at the cost of running AI agents, which often need dozens of model calls to finish a single job. MiniMax said

Oct 19, 2026

NiCE bets the company on AI, data and accountability, and the legacy business buys it time

Every company in the customer experience ecosystem now claims to be an artificial intelligence company. Last week, at NiCE Ltd.’s annual industry analyst summit, the company demonstrated what happens when an AI strategy shifts the organization’s center of gravity. A year after closing the Cognigy ac

Oct 19, 2026

Neural Concept launches MCP to help AI agents operate commercial CAD tools

Switzerland-based artificial intelligence-native engineering company Neural Concept SA today launched Model Context Protocol Bridge, a capability that will help AI agents operate commercial computer-aided design and simulation tools. This will also help large engineering organizations automate compl

Oct 19, 2026

Similar Posts

Palo Alto Networks tackles the risks of autonomous AI agents

AI agent security is moving into runtime as enterprises seek to govern autonomous actions, tool calls, models and data exchanges.

Sep 24, 2026

AI governance moves from observability to provable control

As artificial intelligence agents move from experimental tools into production systems, enterprise governance is being forced to answer a harder question. It is no longer enough to know what an agent did. Organizations increasingly need to prove what the agent was authorized to do, why it was allowe

Sep 19, 2026

More agents go rogue — but AI companies aren’t slowing down yet

It’s becoming more apparent every day that artificial intelligence agents are escaping our control — but it’s not yet apparent who or what is going to rein them in. This week a researcher found that a swarm of AI agents, at least two of them from OpenAI, hacked into a government agency among other o

Sep 25, 2026

Identity and permissions aren’t enough to govern AI agent behavior

Presented by BoxIdentity and permissions are no longer enough to secure enterprise AI agents. They govern what an agent can reach, not how it behaves once it starts working on its own, and an autonomous agent can turn legitimate access of enterprise data into unintended action in seconds. That gap i

Aug 31, 2026