CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Should you post that you’re #OpenToWork? A tale of two labor markets.

From TechCrunch

By Jenna Routenberg

April 3, 2023

Should you post that you’re #OpenToWork? A tale of two labor markets.

n
n
n Aline Lernern Contributorn
nn
n n n
n
nn
n Aline Lerner is founder and CEO of interviewing.io, where engineers go to practice technical interviewing.
n n
n More posts by this contributorn
  • To improve close rates for technical interviews, give applicants feedback (good or bad)
  • n
n
n
n
n
n Maxim Massenkoffn Contributorn
nn
nn
n Maxim Massenkoff is an economist and assistant professor at the Naval Postgraduate School.
n n

Job seekers face a dilemma when choosing whether to mark themselves as #OpenToWork on LinkedIn.

On one hand, it sends a clear and useful signal to recruiters. On the other hand, the badge can lump you with a crowd of people who are more likely to be unemployed or unhappy with their jobs, which could be seen as a negative sign — you know, the old Groucho Marx quote: I don’t want to belong to any club that would accept me as a member.

If you’re a software engineer who’s on the market, should you list yourself as OpenToWork? Does doing so send a negative signal? And with the recent deluge of layoffs at tech companies, has the meaning of #OpenToWork changed? We decided to find out.

n
n We aggregated pass/fail rates in the interviews our users did and cross-referenced them with whether users marked themselves as OpenToWork on their LinkedIns.
n
n

The setup

interviewing.io is an interview practice platform and a tech recruiting marketplace. Engineers use us for mock interviews and companies use us to hire top performers. In our lifetime, we’ve hosted over 100k technical interviews, split between mocks and real ones. To test whether listing yourself as OpenToWork is a good thing to do, we aggregated pass/fail rates in the interviews our users did and cross-referenced them with whether users marked themselves as OpenToWork on their LinkedIns. We also made sure to check their LinkedIns twice: once in early 2021, when there were practically no tech layoffs, and again in early 2023, in the wake of the worst round of tech layoffs since 2001.

Why did we check twice? Economic theory suggests that the people laid off or searching for a job in boom times are different from those laid off in a recession. If you are let go or cannot find a job when companies are flush, it might be that you were laid off for performance reasons or can never get past a screening call. On the other hand, someone who suffered from an across-the-board layoff in a time of economic crisis could be perfectly capable, just a casualty of macroeconomic forces.

We found that being OpenToWork is far more common now. Among the over ten thousand people that we had LinkedIn data for, only 1.4% had the badge in 2021 compared to 4.2% in the first quarter of 2023.

The results

How do these two cohorts of OpenToWork engineers perform?

We found that being OpenToWork was a negative signal for those who had it up in 2021, a boom time for tech hiring. The chart below shows the percentage of people who passed their interviews — our summary measure of candidate performance. On average, about 51 percent of candidates pass their interviews. In contrast, those with OpenToWork badges in 2021 were fully 7 percentage points below that, at 44%.

Should you post that you’re #OpenToWork? A tale of two labor markets. by Jenna Routenberg originally published on TechCrunch

Most Recent

DeepSeek releases updated V4.1-Flash model it says completes tasks faster

Chinese artificial intelligence startup Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Basic Technology Research Co. Ltd. has released an updated version of its V4.1-Flash model that it says completes tasks faster. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 arrives a little over five weeks after the company launched the o

Oct 18, 2026

Investor Concerns Over AI Sector Weigh on Nscale’s IPO Valuation Prospects

Nscale Ltd. is facing opposition to the valuation target it's pursuing in its initial public offering, according to people familiar …

Oct 18, 2026

Disney agrees to hire the majority of Character.AI’s workforce

After chatbot startup Character.AI filed for bankruptcy earlier this week, many of its employees will have the opportunity to take jobs at Disney.

Oct 18, 2026

Apple HomeView With Robotic Arm; New Mac, iPad Mini Nov. 6 Release; iPhone Duo

Also: The company is planning Nov. 6 retail store reset, indicating potential Mac release date.

Oct 18, 2026

Similar Posts

Should you post that you’re #OpenToWork? A tale of two labor markets

We compared pass/fail rates in our users’ mock interviews with whether users marked themselves as OpenToWork on their LinkedIns. Here are the results.

Apr 3, 2023

Interview Buddy Provides Real-Time AI Support During Job Interviews

Interview Buddy by AIApply listens to live interview questions and generates real-time talking points, structured STAR-format response suggestions, and immediate feedback.

Apr 8, 2026

I Got an Early Look at LinkedIn's New AI Job Interviewer. It Told Me How to Stop Rambling

CNET got an early look at LinkedIn's new AI interview prep feature, which builds personalized mock interviews from job postings, returns a readiness scorecard with rewrite suggestions, and is rolling out in English to all Premium subscribers.

Sep 16, 2025

The New Best AI Interview Prep Tool

The Job Insiders reports that LinkedIn's previous Interview Prep surface is no longer available, advising job seekers to move to another interview-practice tool.

Jun 26, 2025