Home
Loading

aVenture is in Alpha: During this preview period, you should expect the research data to be limited and may not yet meet our exacting standards. We've made the decision to provide early access to our data to showcase the product as we build, but you should not yet rely upon it alone for your investment decisions.

aVenture is in Alpha: During this preview period, you should expect the research data to be limited and may not yet meet our exacting standards. We've made the decision to provide early access to our data to showcase the product as we build, but you should not yet rely upon it alone for your investment decisions.

Get in touch

  • Contact

  • Request a demo

  • Request data updates

  • Add a company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Sitemap

  • Feature requests

Member

Backed by

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy Policy

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
More details emerge on how Windsurf’s VCs and founders got paid from the Google deal

From TechCrunch

By Marina Temkin

August 1, 2025

More details emerge on how Windsurf’s VCs and founders got paid from the Google deal

More details emerge on how Windsurf’s VCs and founders got paid from the Google deal

Weeks after the revelation that Google paid Windsurf $2.4 billion to license its technology, while simultaneously hiring away its CEO and top talent, the deal’s implications are still rattling some founders and startup employees across Silicon Valley.

Google’s payment to the startup was effectively split in two equal parts, according to two people familiar with the deal. Investors’ portion was $1.2 billion. 

The other half was in the form of compensation packages for approximately 40 Windsurf employees hired by the tech giant with a substantial portion of that $1.2 billion going to the startup’s co-founders, Varun Mohan and Douglas Chen, sources say.

The transaction was a good outcome for VCs, which included Greenoaks, Kleiner Perkins, and General Catalyst. Windsurf raised a total of about $243 millio as of its last raise in 2024 that valued the company at $1.25 billion, which means the total return to investors was about 4x their original funding. 

Greenoaks, which led Windsurf’s seed and Series A financings and owned 20% of the company, returned about $500 million on their $65 million investment in the startup, according to a person familiar with the matter. Kleiner Perkins, which led Windsurf’s Series B, returned about 3x its invested capital, according to another person familiar with the deal.

Google, Kleiner Perkins, and Greenoaks declined to comment. General Catalyst, Varun Mohan, and Douglas Chen didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Even so, most investors were aiming for a more significant win from the company.

In February, TechCrunch reported that Kleiner Perkins was in talks to lead a fresh round of funding, valuing the startup, which was then known as Codeium, at $2.85 billio . That deal didn’t happen, according to a person familiar with the matter, because Windsurf had instead agreed to be purchased by OpenAI for $3 billio .

As we all know now, the OpenAI acquisition unraveled and Google swooped i with its deal structured to offer investor returns and obtain talent and IP without acquiring stock. 

But what’s rattling the Valley is this: While Google’s deal was good for the co-founders and VCs, it didn’t benefit a large portion of Windsurf’s approximately 250 employees, especially after they were expecting a payout from the sale to OpenAI.

In a typical acquisition, employees would get money for the shares they owned and would often have their vesting schedule accelerated. However, Windsurf employees who were hired over the last year didn’t receive a payout from the deal, these people said.

The Google deal was especially unsettling to approximately 200 Windsurf employees not hired by the search giant. 

Instead of siphoning every penny of Google’s payment into their own pockets, investors opted to leave the company with over $100 million in capital.

One source says this was entirely funded by VCs, meaning their total payout was about $1.1 billion. However, another person said that the founders equally chipped in to leave the company with a nest egg from the Google payment.

Multiple people said that the money left for the company would have been sufficient to pay all remaining employees proceeds at the Google deal’s per-share valuation, regardless of how long they had been with the company.  However, to have done that immediately would have been problematic, leaving the company with less cash to operate and — with founders and key people gone — with no investors ready to finance a new raise. The remaining leadership would likely have had to shut down after making such cash distributions, one of the people said. Meanwhile, another person claimed that the company had enough capital to pay out employees and continue to operate.

That difference of opinion is only part of the reason the deal became so controversial.

What’s more, at least some of the employees Google did hire, despite attractive pay and benefits, saw their stock grants revoked and their vesting timelines restarted. That meant they’d have to wait an additional four years for their total payout in Google stock, according to people familiar with the deal. 

Some top VCs condemned the 3-year-old startup’s co-founders for not sharing their windfall with all the people who helped build the company.

“Windsurf and others are really bad examples of founders leaving their teams behind and not even sharing the proceeds with their team,” wrote Vinod Khosla on X. “I definitely would not work with their founders next time.”

After several days of limbo following the announcement of the Google deal, Windsurf’s remaining entity, under the leadership of interim CEO Jeff Wang, managed to sell itself to Cognition.

Cognition acquired Windsurf’s IP and product and brought on all staff not hired by Google.

While the exact deal terms of that sale were not disclosed, the acquisition allowed every employee to financially gain from the sale, according to a blog published by Cognitio .  

Two other sources estimated to TechCrunch that Cognition paid $250 million to acquire Windsurf’s remaining entity. 

Cognition didn’t respond to a request for comment.

View original article on techcrunch.com

Most Recent

Travis Kalanick’s robotics company raises $1.7B, led by a16z

Travis Kalanick’s robotics company raises $1.7B, led by a16z

Uber is also investing in Travis Kalanick's company Atoms, which has made gauzy claims about using industrial AI to modernize the world.

Jul 22, 2026

Arcee, a US open source AI lab, says Chinese models are not inherently dangerous

Arcee, a US open source AI lab, says Chinese models are not inherently dangerous

As Chinese AI models grow in capability and popularity among U.S. companies, the arguing over what should be done about them has reached a fever pitch.

Jul 22, 2026

Cascade raises $3.5M to help construction firms find and win projects

Cascade raises $3.5M to help construction firms find and win projects

a16z Speedrun, Ada Ventures, and Snowball VC have invested in Cascade's $3.5 million seed round.

Jul 22, 2026

The browser wars aren’t about search anymore — here are the best alternatives to Chrome and Safari

The browser wars aren’t about search anymore — here are the best alternatives to Chrome and Safari

We’ve compiled an overview of some of the top alternative browsers available today aiming to challenge Chrome and Safari.

Jul 22, 2026

Similar Posts

No similar posts found for this article.

Most Recent

Travis Kalanick’s robotics company raises $1.7B, led by a16z

Travis Kalanick’s robotics company raises $1.7B, led by a16z

Uber is also investing in Travis Kalanick's company Atoms, which has made gauzy claims about using industrial AI to modernize the world.

Jul 22, 2026

Arcee, a US open source AI lab, says Chinese models are not inherently dangerous

Arcee, a US open source AI lab, says Chinese models are not inherently dangerous

As Chinese AI models grow in capability and popularity among U.S. companies, the arguing over what should be done about them has reached a fever pitch.

Jul 22, 2026

Cascade raises $3.5M to help construction firms find and win projects

Cascade raises $3.5M to help construction firms find and win projects

a16z Speedrun, Ada Ventures, and Snowball VC have invested in Cascade's $3.5 million seed round.

Jul 22, 2026

The browser wars aren’t about search anymore — here are the best alternatives to Chrome and Safari

The browser wars aren’t about search anymore — here are the best alternatives to Chrome and Safari

We’ve compiled an overview of some of the top alternative browsers available today aiming to challenge Chrome and Safari.

Jul 22, 2026

Similar Posts

No similar posts found for this article.