CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Privacy FAQ

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Brian Chesky interview: AI agents need their own operating system

From TechCrunch

By Ivan Mehta

October 1, 2026

Brian Chesky interview: AI agents need their own operating system

Brian Chesky interview: AI agents need their own operating system

Airbnb rolled out its new AI-powered search this week as part of its fall update, a significant step for a company that has been slow and deliberate about AI. Co-founder and CEO Brian Chesky has said in the past that a chatbot-only interface is not fit for travel discovery. With more AI on the way to the Airbnb app, I caught up with Chesky over Zoom to talk about how the company is approaching it, where interfaces are headed, why consumer AI still isn’t working, and what role voice will play.

Chesky hasn’t changed his mind on chatbots. He said they aren’t good for browsing or shopping because they give you a few options at a time, and you have to take multiple turns before reaching a result. But he doesn’t see the current version of Airbnb’s search as the final form either: its interface will evolve over time.

“I think that I’ve believed for a long time that a chatbot isn’t the right interface for e-commerce. I think what you’re seeing today is also not the endgame for e-commerce or for travel or shopping. I think that there’s going to be some interface that is, you know, I don’t want to call it a midpoint, but something between a chatbot and what you see in the first version we shipped,” he said.

Continued Chesky: “You know, a lot of people want some things … to be fast and easy, like ‘Book me a flight, I don’t want to look at it.’ With Airbnb, they enjoy looking at the product. Travel studies show that people actually derive more pleasure in planning and anticipating travel than they do traveling. So you don’t want to take the inspiration and the browsing and the library experience of dreaming away.”

Chesky sees a second problem with chatbots, which is that they are built for one person. He feels that they aren’t a collaborative interface, which matters for a product that people often use with family and friends. Over the next three to six months, the company’s task is to explore interfaces that enable “multiplayer” AI, meaning AI that several people, such as a group planning a trip together, can use at once.

Airbnb isn’t the only one rethinking what an AI interface should look like. As AI tools evolve, new interfaces are also showing up in apps. Startups like Monogram and, more recently, Wabi are experimenting with “generative” interfaces, which are screens an AI builds on-the-fly rather than ones a designer fixed in advance. Chesky thinks people will see a mix of deterministic (pre-designed and predictable) and generative interfaces.

I asked Chesky how Airbnb is preparing for consumer AI agents, which are tools like Instinct and Muse that carry out tasks on a person’s behalf. Agents will need robust software infrastructure on Airbnb’s end, he said, and the company wants to make itself more agent-friendly. In his view, they could be good lead generators.

“I don’t necessarily know if I believe in a world that there’s apps in the future, but I don’t believe in a world where the apps become data layers of a universal simple UI because when you open your iPhone, there is a reason Airbnb’s app is a different design than DoorDash, Shopify, and Amazon. Our interfaces should be adaptive to the utility and the function that we’re doing. We want to make our app more agentic, and we want to build a lot more user interface controls,” he said.

“If I have an agent, but I also want like really great browse functionality, if I want to be able to message the host like an Airbnb, if I want to be able to compare, if I want to be able to verify my identity, if I want to be able to use a map feature, if I want to then be able to add other items, then if I want to stay in the platform, then either the agent has to do a handoff or the agent application would need to build a bit more of, I think, a robust software developer kit to bring the app to you, so to speak.”

Chesky thinks that there were concerns around AI tools cutting companies like Airbnb out of the customer relationship, but he said that chatbots have proven to be good at lead generation.

The Airbnb CEO is also planning for agent-to-agent interactions through the platform. He explained there might be some interactions within the platform and some with agents of other apps. His thesis is that apps have not always been interoperable unless companies struck a business deal. On the other hand, agents are like “apps with faces,” and when they talk to each other, all apps can become interoperable.

“I think of the Airbnb app as one day becoming an agent, you know, where basically the explore tab has an agent, our customer service has an agent, we’re developing another agent in another service area. Probably eventually there’s going to be a macro Airbnb agent. And that will probably be interoperable with MCP [a standard that lets AI agents connect with other software] to other agents,” Chesky noted.

Chesky argues the bigger problem is that the industry lacks a true operating system built for AI. Right now people are building AI apps for iOS, macOS, and Windows that are not “AI operating systems.” He thinks that in an ideal world, AI would be operable at the kernel level — the core of an operating system — and all components like agents would interact with each other. Right now, he said, the race is to be the “quarterback,” or primary AI agent that users go through for everything.

“The problem with that model [of trying to become primary agent] is no one is developing a full operating system software developer kit. I’ll give you an example,” he continued. “ChatGPT, at the beginning of last year, tried to do their little app store. And I told Sam [Altman]: If you want to be an app store like the iPhone, you need to have a software developer kit and an operating system like the App Store. Otherwise, none of our functionality is going to exist. And of course, it didn’t work very well,” Chesky said.

“I’ve used Airbnb on Muse and Instinct,” he went on. “And it doesn’t work very well. I mean, even hotels don’t work that well, but Airbnbs work even worse. So I don’t think we’ve cracked consumer AI. And for consumer AI to be cracked, we have to crack at a lower substrate, and we need to make the agents [into] apps; all apps need to become agents; all must be interoperable; and all must have much richer user interfaces.”

Chesky thinks that there are two misconceptions in Silicon Valley: first, that the interface is going away and people will just talk and type; second, that software will be completely generative. His argument is that a designer can prompt better software than a consumer can.

He also thinks that as long as the iPhone remains dominant and Apple and Google control the major platforms, apps will likely remain a central fixture.

“It’s really up to Apple or Google, or somebody, to build a new platform for us to really make the true shift from apps to agents. Otherwise, we’re going to have apps that have agents inside them, rather than the whole app being a robust agent that’s interoperable with other agents,” he said.

Before we wrapped up, I asked Chesky about voice, which is gaining ground as apps like Wispr Flow, Willow, and Superwhisper, a new wave of note-taking apps, and built-in dictation in AI tools get people talking to their devices more. He thinks people will eventually speak to computers more than they type. Voice, he said, will play a key part for Airbnb in search and customer service, and the company plans to roll out voice agents this fall to help users.

The company has also been seeing big gains from using AI to ship features faster, he volunteered. On a personal level, Chesky said AI has helped him get information faster, freeing him from so many meetings.

“I think AI is reducing communication layers. One of my jobs as CEO is try to get information. And the way I used to get information was having meetings. Now, I can just ask my AI and I don’t need to have as many,” he said.

View original article on techcrunch.com

Most Recent

Sharing AI progress in mathematics

We're releasing a broad range of new mathematical results produced by an internal frontier model.

Oct 6, 2026

Xbox has secured exclusive GTA 6 streaming rights

The streaming rights come in November, when Microsoft is opening up access to Xbox Cloud Gaming.

Oct 6, 2026

SoftBank-Backed DayOne Data Centers Plans to Raise Up to $5.0 Bln in U.S. IPO

The data-center operator is also backed by Coatue Management, Hillhouse and Citadel — A SoftBank-backed data-center company …

Oct 6, 2026

Report: Apple’s smart home push includes LG-made doorbell, lock, thermostat, more

Bloomberg reports that Apple’s plans for smart home products include devices, sensors, and cameras codeveloped in partnership with LG.

Oct 6, 2026

Similar Posts

OpenAI's latest features take direct aim at the app store model

OpenAI is building out the pieces of an alternative to the traditional app store model, turning ChatGPT into a place where software can be discovered and used by people and AI agents alike.

Sep 29, 2026

The Rise and Fall of Agent Civilizations

The whole OpenAI/Hugging Face story in plain English

Aug 29, 2026

OpenAI and the Wiki Incident

I did not expect to be back here so soon with more OpenAI agent swarm coverage.

Sep 6, 2026

Rabbit Is Back, This Time With an AI Agent App

Two years after trying to sidestep mobile apps with dedicated AI hardware, Rabbit is launching OS3, a cross-platform agent that lives on the screens you already use.

Sep 22, 2026