aVenture is in Alpha: aVenture recently launched early public access to our research product. It's intended to illustrate capabilities and gather feedback from users. While in Alpha, you should expect the research data to be limited and may not yet meet our exacting standards. We've made the decision to temporarily present this information to showcase the product's potential, but you should not yet rely upon it for your investment decisions.
aVenture is in Alpha: aVenture recently launched early public access to our research product. It's intended to illustrate capabilities and gather feedback from users. While in Alpha, you should expect the research data to be limited and may not yet meet our exacting standards. We've made the decision to temporarily present this information to showcase the product's potential, but you should not yet rely upon it for your investment decisions.
© aVenture Investment Company, 2024. All rights reserved.
44 Tehama St, San Francisco, CA 94105
Privacy Policy
aVenture Investment Company (“aVenture”) is an independent research platform providing information and analysis about startups.
Certain metrics provided by aVenture may seek to assess the risks and opportunities associated with a company, fund, or its representatives (collectively “research”). aVenture seeks to provide this information with objectivity and fairness, and with diligence about its accuracy. Nonetheless, aVenture cannot provide assurance as to the accuracy of the information provided by our research. We strongly advise those using the research platform to seek multiple, independent sources for your research when making financial decisions.
Any links provided to other websites are offered as a matter of convenience and are not intended to imply that aVenture or its authors endorse, sponsor, promote, and/or are affiliated with the owners of or participants in those sites.
The aVenture platform also provides investment listings offered by independent investment advisers in the United States. aVenture is neither a registered investment adviser nor an exempt reporting adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and no statements made by aVenture are intended to imply any financial instruments are under the counsel or advice of aVenture or its representatives.
Funds offered on the platform are generally managed by a private investment adviser that, unless stated otherwise, claims exemption from SEC or state registration. Investment funds presented on the platform are only available to investors who meet the requirements of the offering, and solicitations are not made outside those listed jurisdictions.
Additionally, each investment offered on the platform has qualifications for eligibility, including some offered only to Qualified Clients and/or Accredited Investors. Certain funds may be available to non-Qualified or Accredited investors, but only those who become personally known and identifiable to aVenture Investment Company staff, who have had an opportunity to assess the financial capacity and suitability for such an investment, and discuss its risks. Funds, when offered, are only offered following a review of a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM), subscription agreement, and other disclosures.
Investments in startups, venture capital, angel investments, private equity, real estate, stocks, and similar asset classes all involve risks, including: the risk of a decline in the value of your investments, including potentially large declines (suddenly and/or for long periods of time), the potential for illiquidity where part or all of a withdrawal request may not be honored on the date requested (even when a feature of the fund). These risks are heightened during periods of market duress.
Diversification has the possibility of reducing the magnitude of declines (either caused by market/economic factors, or by factors related to the individual company), but does not guarantee these risks have been fully or partially alleviated. Most importantly, past results are not an assurance of future outcomes. While most of these risks are shared and similarly held by other investment asset classes, we recommend investors only consider venture capital investments as part of a broader, diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds, and immediately accessible cash reserves.
From Startups | TechCrunch
By Julie Bort
April 24, 2024
It is a universal truth of human nature that the developers who build the code should not be the ones to test it. First of all, most of them pretty much detest that task. Second, like any good auditing protocol, those who do the work should not be the ones who verify it.
Not surprisingly, then, code testing in all its forms – usability, language- or task-specific tests, end-to-end testing – has been a focus of a growing cadre of generative AI startups. Every week, TechCrunch covers another one like Antithesis (raised $47 million); CodiumAI (raised $11 million) QA Wolf (raised $20 million). And new ones are emerging all the time, like new Y Combinator graduate Momentic.
Another is year-old startup Nova AI, an Unusual Academy accelerator grad that’s raised a $1 million pre-seed round. It is attempting to best its competitors with its end-to-end testing tools by breaking many of the Silicon Valley rules of how startups should operate, founder CEO Zach Smith tells TechCrunch.
Whereas the standard Y Combinator approach is to start small, Nova AI is aiming at mid-size to large enterprises with complex code-bases and a burning need now. Smith declined to name any customers using or testing its product except to describe them as mostly late-stage (series C or beyond) venture-backed startups in ecommerce, fintech or consumer products, and “heavy user experiences. Downtime for these features is costly.”
Nova AI’s tech sifts through its customers’ code to build tests automatically using GenAI. It is particularly geared toward continuous integration and continuous delivery/deployment (CI/CD) environments where engineers are constantly shipping bits and pieces into their production code.
The idea for Nova AI came from the experiences Smith and his cofounder Jeffrey Shih had when they were engineers working for big tech companies. Smith is a former Googler who worked on cloud-related teams that helped customers use a lot of automation technology. Shih had previously worked at Meta (also at Unity and Microsoft before that) with a rare AI speciality involving synthetic data. They’ve since added a third cofounder, AI data scientist Henry Li.
Another rule Nova AI is not following: while boatloads of AI startups are building on top of OpenAI’s industry leading GPT, Nova AI is using OpenAI’s Chat GPT-4 as little as possible, only to help it generate some code and to do some labeling tasks. No customer data is being fed to OpenAI.
While OpenAI promises that the data of those on a paid business plan is not being used to train its models, enterprises still do not trust OpenAI, Smith tells us. “When we’re talking to large enterprises, they’re like, ‘We don’t want our data going into OpenAI,” Smith said.
The engineering teams of large companies are not the only ones that feel this way. OpenAI is fending off a number of lawsuits from those who don’t want it to use their work for model training, or believe their work wound up, unauthorized and unpaid for, in its outputs.
Nova AI is instead heavily relying on open source models like Llama developed by Meta and StarCoder (from the BigCoder community, which was developed by ServiceNow and Hugging Face), as well as building its own models. They aren’t yet using Google’s Gemma with customers, but have tested it and “seen good results,” Smith says.
For instance, he explains that a common use for OpenAI GPT4 is to “produce vector embeddings” on data so LLM models can use the vectors for semantic search. Vector embeddings translate chunks of text into numbers so the LLM can perform various operations, such as cluster them with other chunks of similar text. Nova AI is using OpenAI’s GPT4 for this on the customer’s source code, but is going to lengths not to send any data into OpenAI.
“In this case, instead of using OpenAI’s embedding models, we deploy our own open-source embedding models so that when we need to run through every file, we aren’t just sending it to OpenAi,” Smith explained.
While not sending customer data to OpenAI appeases nervous enterprises, open source AI models are also cheaper and more than sufficient for doing targeted specific tasks, Smith has found. In this case, they work well for writing tests.
“The open LLM industry is really proving that they can beat GPT 4 and these big domain providers, when you go really narrow,” he said. “We don’t have to provide some massive model that can tell you what your grandma wants for her birthday. Right? We need to write a test. And that’s it. So our models are fine-tuned specifically for that.”
Open source models are also progressing quickly. For instance, Meta recently introduced a new version of Llama that’s earning accolades in technology circles and that may convince more AI startups to look at OpenAI alternatives.
View original article on techcrunch.com
Share:
Xaira, an AI drug discovery startup, launches with a massive $1B, says it’s ‘ready’ to start developing drugs
Advances in generative AI have taken the tech world by storm. Biotech investors are making a big bet that similar computational methods could revolutionize drug discovery. On Tuesday, ARCH Venture Partners and Foresite Labs, an affiliate of Foresite Capital, announced that they incubated Xaira Therapeutics and funded the AI biotech with $1 billion. Other investors […] © 2024 TechCrunch. All rights reserved. For personal use only.
Apr 25, 2024
Eric Schmidt-backed Augment, a GitHub Copilot rival, launches out of stealth with $252M
AI is supercharging coding — and developers are embracing it. In a recent StackOverflow poll, 44% of software engineers said that they use AI tools as part of their development processes now and 26% plan to soon. Gartner estimates that over half of organizations are currently piloting or have already deployed AI-driven coding assistants, and […] © 2024 TechCrunch. All rights reserved. For personal use only.
Apr 24, 2024
Radical thinks the time has come for solar-powered, high-altitude autonomous aircraft
Though many eyes are on space as orbit develops into a thriving business ecosystem, Radical is keeping things a little closer to the ground — but not too close. Its high-altitude, solar-powered aircraft aim to succeed where Facebook’s infamous Aquila failed by refining the tech and embracing more markets. It’s hard to believe that Facebook’s […] © 2024 TechCrunch. All rights reserved. For personal use only.
Apr 24, 2024
Don't miss our latest news and updates. Subscribe to the newsletter
More from Tech Crunch: