CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
A 'weird' IPO pull, a tainted reputation and the stalled breakout moment for AI wearables

From CNBC Tech

October 4, 2026

A 'weird' IPO pull, a tainted reputation and the stalled breakout moment for AI wearables

A 'weird' IPO pull, a tainted reputation and the stalled breakout moment for AI wearables

Two years ago, Bella Nowroozi was on a date at the mall when she noticed something odd: A blinking light on her companion's glasses.

The 24-year-old master's student instantly recognized the frames as the Meta Ray-Ban smart glasses she had seen on social media. She told him to delete the recordings.

"I was honestly pretty shocked," Nowroozi told CNBC, reflecting on the interaction. "I hadn't really experienced anything like that before. I was also scared to go on dates after that as openly as I did before."

Apple, Google, Meta and a swarm of other tech contenders are betting that new artificial intelligence wearables in the form of glasses, rings, charms and pendants can push the market toward its category-defining moment. But as the gadgets have grown in notoriety, they've also been met with privacy backlash and doubts about whether the technology is beneficial enough to become a fixture in everyday life.   

Meta made a splash last week with the unveiling of its Tamagotchi-like Muse Charm, a custom housing for its personal agent app that quickly topped Apple's iOS App Store free apps list. The company has continued to release new iterations of its Meta Ray-Ban AI glasses and offers an array of models at different price points.

This week, OpenAI rolled out its own personal assistant called Dots. The ChatGPT maker is also working with iPhone designer Jony Ive on consumer devices, but its first offering does not appear to be a wearable, according to Bloomberg. Apple provided a look at its latest devices at the beginning of September, complete with AI features on the Watch Series 12 that will listen to your conversations.

Besides the plethora of available devices, the market looked set this week to keep the momentum rolling with the debut of smart ring maker Oura.

But on Tuesday, the company delayed its expected initial public offering at the last minute, despite signaling strong demand for its products.

Oura cited "uncertainty in the IPO market" as the reason for the move, but some analysts were skeptical.

"I really believe that there's something else that's causing them to pull out of the IPO, and I don't think it's the market," said Anshel Sag, a principal analyst at Moor Insights & Strategy. "I just can't nail what it is."

"Them jumping out of this IPO is kind of weird," he said.

Branding problems

Meta is navigating pushback to its smart spectacles, which have been dubbed "pervert glasses" on social media because of their discreet cameras that can be used for harassment and other misbehavior.

One social media user said a man took photos of her on a date without her permission. Another said a buyer from Facebook Marketplace took unauthorized videos of her and her children. Meta's own advertising campaign featuring Kylie Jenner filming her everyday life drew further criticism of the surveillance-like nature of the videos.

Meta did not immediately respond to CNBC's request for comment.

DA Davidson analyst Gil Luria said the growing resistance to camera-equipped glasses is a hard battle to overcome.

"It's done for at this moment," said Luria. "We're going to have to revisit this 10 years from now."

When Luria first gifted the spectacles to his twin teenage boys last year, they were "super excited." He says now, they "wouldn't be caught dead in them."

Last month, Meta unveiled a camera-free smart glasses option.

Privacy

The explosion in wearables couldn't come at a more critical time as the policy debate over AI safety risks intensifies in Washington and the blowback takes center stage ahead of the midterm elections in November.

Far from the cute, fuzzy appearance of Meta's Muse character called Jolly, sprawling data centers have become the visual symbol of AI opposition in the U.S. Many argue that wearables and other devices that are always listening or recording have become an extension of that perceived surveillance state.

Flock Safety's license plate scanners are being vandalized and cities have ended contracts with the company over community outcry. Smart glasses have been banned from gyms and other places because of privacy concerns.

In February, the judge in the Meta social media addiction trial in Los Angeles threatened to hold anyone using AI smart glasses during CEO Mark Zuckerberg's testimony in contempt of court. Several people escorting Zuckerberg into the court were wearing the Meta Ray-Ban AI glasses.

"Their value add has to overcome the perception of AI being a technology that people are opposed," said Sag. "It needs to be more helpful and useful than people's apprehensions about it."

Design and execution

GPS delivered maps to a screen, the smartphone created a pocket-sized personal computer and AI promises to bring efficiency and automation to everyday life.

New gadgets in the wearables market are vying to build a new category of devices, but the most futuristic gadgets today aren't necessarily what the consumer wants, said Avi Greengart, founder and tech analyst at market research firm Techsponential.

From sleep readings to exercise tracking and accident detection, health wearables have shown immense promise in a market cornered by big tech giants like Apple and Google, and even startup Oura. Accessibility features added to Apple's AirPods are transforming the popular headphones into hearing aids, Greengart said.

But some of the flashy emerging AI tech, including pins and pendants, has hit significant design and execution roadblocks.

Greengart pointed to the Rabbit r1 personal assistant, which lacked distinct use cases from the smartphone and faced technical and hardware issues. Another failed contender was the Humane AI Pin, discontinued last year following poor customer reviews.

"If you force someone to spend $700 on a device that overheats, has a user interface that doesn't work in sunlight, battery life that is poor, unless what it does is magical, that's not going to work," said Greengart.

Nowroozi, whose sister owns a pair of Meta glasses, is holding off on buying into the AI wearable wave.

"I can't really think of how this would really be different from what a phone could do," she said.

View original article on cnbc.com

Most Recent

Samsung forecasts record third-quarter profit of $80 billion as AI boom fuels chip demand

Samsung Electronics reported preliminary third-quarter earnings on Thursday, with operating profit forecast to top 100 trillion won for the first time.

Oct 7, 2026

Anthropic will be 'most ridiculous IPO' of year, analyst says

Anthropic reportedly plans to list on the Nasdaq before Thanksgiving, and one bearish advisory firm suggests that investors sit this one out.

Oct 7, 2026

FCC to vote on auctioning 25MHz of 'prime spectrum' in move that could benefit Amazon, SpaceX

SpaceX and Amazon have moved to expand providing direct-to-device services with networks of satellites.

Oct 7, 2026

Why AI is both the hope and the hazard for world leaders, according to IMF chief Georgieva

Kristalina Georgieva warns that the technology lifting growth hopes is also pushing up inflation and yields, just as public debt levels rose.

Oct 6, 2026

Similar Posts

Meta Pinky Promises Its Smart Glasses Will Be Private Soon

The company is bringing its Private Processing encryption service to its much-maligned smart glasses.

Sep 23, 2026

Meta gets to consumer AI device market before OpenAI, but Zuckerberg's strategy remains unproven

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's new Muse Charm device is intended to put his company ahead of rivals like OpenAI and Google in AI agents and consumer hardware.

Sep 24, 2026

Meta debuts its Muse AI agent. Will consumers trust it?

Meta's new personal AI agent Muse wants access to users' email, calendars, payments, health services, and more — making the company's biggest consumer AI bet yet a major test of whether people still trust Meta with their data.

Sep 8, 2026

Meta pushes into personal AI agents as company faces public reckoning over privacy and safety

Meta unveiled its Muse personal agent app that comes in a free tier or a monthly subscription costing $20 or $100 depending on usage.

Sep 8, 2026