CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Storage admins get automated guardrails as agents outrun human-in-the-loop review

From SiliconANGLE

By Ryan Stevens

October 5, 2026

Storage admins get automated guardrails as agents outrun human-in-the-loop review

Storage admins get automated guardrails as agents outrun human-in-the-loop review

Enterprises pushing AI agents into production are finding that cyber resilience now depends as much on governing what autonomous software does with data as on keeping attackers out. Much of the risk doesn’t come from malicious intent at all; it comes from agents doing unexpected things at machine speed.

That shift is pushing storage providers to build intelligent data infrastructure that can judge how data is being used. NetApp Inc. is moving access controls away from simple yes-or-no permissions and toward policies based on behavior, according to Russell Fishman (pictured), senior director of global AI solutions and field activation of NetApp.

“We’re starting to get away from thinking about everything through a human lens,” Fishman said. “This is an agent. Agents don’t think the same way. They’re not acting the same way.”

Fishman spoke with theCUBE’s Christophe Bertrand and Rebecca Knight at NetApp INSIGHT, during an exclusive broadcast on theCUBE, SiliconANGLE Media’s livestreaming studio. They discussed a week of NetApp announcements, including Novus, a new storage architecture for AI factories and neoclouds, and the growing importance of cyber resilience as the market matures. (* Disclosure below.)

Cyber resilience moves into the data layer

NetApp’s traditional protection tools still carry weight as threats speed up. Its autonomous ransomware protection service uses AI to detect and block attacks, and a newly announced integration feeds those signals into recovery workflows from Commvault Systems Inc., Fishman explained. NetApp has built similar links with Microsoft Corp.’s Sentinel and Cisco Systems Inc.’s Splunk, he added.

“We become an indicator of compromise,” he said. “We can actually detect things and tell Commvault, ‘hey, there’s a problem,’ and vice versa.”

AI agents raise a different problem. Most organizations Fishman talks with worry less about bad actors than about agents causing unintended consequences while they try to finish an assigned task. New features in NetApp’s AI Data Engine, which prepares and governs enterprise data for AI, include a behavior-based policy engine that flags unusual patterns of data use, he noted.

“I would expect you to look at maybe one customer’s account, not all of the customers’ accounts,” he said. “That seems a bit weird to me.”

Responding at the speed of AI means organizations can’t always keep a human in the loop, so automation has to carry more of the load, Fishman explained. For NetApp customers who want stronger cyber resilience now, AI Data Engine can be deployed against any existing NetApp system, and the company announced a free six-month offer at the event, according to Fishman.

“If I was an ONTAP admin — if I was a NetApp customer — that’s the first thing I’d be doing,” Fishman said. “I want to lock this down now. The risk of not doing so, not just from a lack of innovation, but the risk of misuse of data, the lack of control, it’s too great.”

Here’s the complete video interview, part of SiliconANGLE’s and theCUBE’s coverage of NetApp INSIGHT:

(* Disclosure: TheCUBE is a paid media partner for the NetApp INSIGHT 2026 event. Neither NetApp, the sponsor of theCUBE’s event coverage, nor other sponsors have editorial control over content on theCUBE or SiliconANGLE.)

Photo: SiliconANGLE

View original article on siliconangle.com

Most Recent

Midwest Wheel builds toward AI agents that fix problems

Agentic AI governance shapes how Midwest Wheel Companies hands work to AI agents, with humans checking cash tasks and data.

Oct 7, 2026

Three insights you might have missed from theCUBE’s coverage of ‘The AI ROI in Contact Center Summit’

Customer service teams are using agentic AI to improve resolutions, preserve context and balance automation with human support.

Oct 7, 2026

Opinion: Washington’s new state income tax must be repealed

Editor’s note: GeekWire publishes guest opinions to highlight a range of perspectives on issues shaping the tech and startup community. To submit a guest column, email tips@geekwire.com. This fall, Washington state voters will once again have to defend their economic future and core competitive edge

Oct 7, 2026

Kore.ai launches Autoloop to keep tuning enterprise AI agents after they go live

Enterprise artificial intelligence platform company Kore.ai Inc. today launched Autoloop, an optimization engine for the AI agents that customers build on its Kore.ai Agent Platform. Businesses set the targets, and Autoloop keeps adjusting the agents to hit them automatically, including after they’r

Oct 7, 2026

Similar Posts

What to expect during the AI Cybersecurity and Resilience Summit

AI trust takes the stage at the AI Cybersecurity and Resilience Summit as leaders examine cyber resilience and strategies for building strong digital systems.

Oct 5, 2026

Cohesity’s new Agent Resilience lets companies roll back AI agents that go wrong

Data security company Cohesity Inc. today introduced Cohesity Agent Resilience at its Catalyst conference. The new Cohesity Data Cloud capability backs up the memory and configuration of enterprise artificial intelligence agents so they can be rolled back to a trusted state when something goes wrong

Sep 16, 2026

NetApp hands storage operations to AI agents, but humans still draw the boundaries

Data governance shapes how NetApp lets AI agents manage storage operations, with humans setting policy boundaries and reviewing audit trails.

Oct 2, 2026

The three layers of agentic AI security: A defense-in-depth architecture for autonomous agents

Presented by Nutanix Autonomous systems that can reason, make their own decisions, and execute actions across an environment introduce a category of risk that application-level controls were never built to contain. Treating that risk as a single problem produces incomplete architectures, says Osca

Aug 28, 2026