CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Three insights you might have missed from theCUBE’s coverage of ‘The AI ROI in Contact Center Summit’

From SiliconANGLE

By Manny Veiga

October 7, 2026

Three insights you might have missed from theCUBE’s coverage of ‘The AI ROI in Contact Center Summit’

Three insights you might have missed from theCUBE’s coverage of ‘The AI ROI in Contact Center Summit’

Artificial intelligence is helping to change what success looks like for customer service teams, with less focus on call speed and deflection and greater emphasis on resolving customer issues. That shift is changing how companies think about the role of AI, from automating individual tasks to orchestrating interactions between customers, AI agents and human employees.

The conversation at The AI ROI in Contact Center Summit revolved around the ways companies can blend humans and agentic AI to deliver better customer service experiences. In the event kickoff, theCUBE Research’s Bob Laliberte (pictured, left) explained why call centers are ultimately an ideal proving ground for the efficacy of agentic AI.

“Contact centers have large volumes of interactions. There [are] significant labor costs and direct moments of truth with customers,” Laliberte said. “When something fails, the consequences are also pretty highly visible, and a poor AI interaction can increase customer effort, damage trust and ultimately hurt the brand.”

Laliberte offered that analysis alongside Zeus Kerravala (right), principal analyst and founder of ZK Research, A Division of Kerravala Consulting, during theCUBE’s coverage of The AI ROI in Contact Center Summit. They also talked with industry experts from TalkDesk Inc., Cisco Systems Inc. and Five9 Inc., among other companies, about how AI is changing customer experience economics. (* Disclosure below.)

Here’s the complete video interview with Bob Laliberte and Zeus Kerravala:

Insight #1: Customer service success goes beyond resolution time

Customers and call center operators can often disagree on what makes for a successful customer service interaction. That’s partly because the industry has historically focused on speed of resolution, Kerravala emphasized.

“Historically, we’ve measured success in the context of things like average handle time, first call resolution,” he said. “Those metrics don’t … matter as much anymore. We’ve had such a focus on average handle time in this industry, but is that shorter call actually a good thing if the issue remains largely unsolved?”

Agentic AI could enable richer customer service interactions, but the focus needs to remain on relationship management, according to Vinod Muthukrishnan, vice president and general manager of Webex customer experience at Cisco. That’s the vision behind Cisco’s AI Concierge, which seeks to provide continuous conversational context regardless of which “front door” a customer enters through at the start of a service interaction.

“An AI agent that can fill a slot or fulfill a transaction is not agentic. Agentic is much more of a framework of tools and products and processes,” he said. “The big thing around agentic is going away from just voice agents that can answer a question, fulfill a transaction, to orchestrating a journey, to now evolving all the way to be able to orchestrate a relationship.”

Here’s the complete video interview with Vinod Muthukrishnan:

Insight #2: AI agents can help close the gap between conversation and resolution

Customer success teams should be measured on “conversation to completion,” or how effectively they resolve the customer’s problem. AI agents can help by preserving context across handoffs between AI and human agents, noted Ram Rajagolpalan, head of product, AI for Zoom CX at Zoom Communications Inc.

“You want to transfer the full context, the reason why they’re calling, the collected variables that you need to pass on to a human being so that human being can get on with the job and get it done without having to repeat themselves or look at 10 different places of record just to answer a simple question,” he told theCUBE.

To get started, businesses should deploy AI agents where they can have the most immediate impact. There are some obvious places to start, explained Joe Rittenhouse, co-chief executive officer of Converged Technology Professionals Inc., a Zoom implementation partner.

“Usually where we try to start is, where’s the low-hanging fruit?” he said. “Just a simple question of what do you do after hours? We’re usually staffed, we follow the sun from the East Coast to the West Coast, but then after hours we just have a general mailbox. The answer is typically, I don’t know.”

Here’s the complete video interview with Joe Rittenhouse and Ram Rajagopalan:

Insight #3: AI can handle volume while humans handle complexity

The best model for call center workflows could be a mix of human and AI agents, with AI handling high-volume, low-stakes calls such as password resets while humans focus on sensitive conversations and high-value customers. That balance could help bridge the gap between how contact centers measure success and what customers expect, explained Amit Mathradas, CEO and board member of Five9.

“From the research we have done, we found one stat really amazing,” he told theCUBE. “Ninety-nine percent of business practitioners who are deploying AI think their contact centers and their serviceability has gotten better. Only 66% of actual users think the contact center has gotten better. More than 50% of them are saying the reason is, ‘I want to access a human and I don’t get that.’”

Here’s the complete video interview with Amit Mathradas:

The industry needs a better operating model to enable agentic orchestration. This kind of model would account for governance, integration and connected workflows to ensure enterprise readiness, according to Pedro Andrade, vice president of AI and generative AI business specialist at Talkdesk.

“Customer Experience Automation, CXA, is what we defined as an operating model,” he said in a theCUBE interview. “It’s not a category of technology. It’s the system that coordinates a hybrid workforce of AI and human employees. Then connecting the systems, connecting knowledge and also connecting the workflows.”

Here’s the complete video interview with Pedro Andrade:

Catch up on our complete video coverage of The AI ROI in Contact Center Summit:

(* Disclosure: TheCUBE is a paid media partner for “The AI ROI in Contact Center Summit.” Sponsors of theCUBE’s event coverage do not have editorial control over content on theCUBE or SiliconANGLE.)

Photo: SiliconANGLE

View original article on siliconangle.com

Most Recent

Midwest Wheel builds toward AI agents that fix problems

Agentic AI governance shapes how Midwest Wheel Companies hands work to AI agents, with humans checking cash tasks and data.

Oct 7, 2026

Opinion: Washington’s new state income tax must be repealed

Editor’s note: GeekWire publishes guest opinions to highlight a range of perspectives on issues shaping the tech and startup community. To submit a guest column, email tips@geekwire.com. This fall, Washington state voters will once again have to defend their economic future and core competitive edge

Oct 7, 2026

Kore.ai launches Autoloop to keep tuning enterprise AI agents after they go live

Enterprise artificial intelligence platform company Kore.ai Inc. today launched Autoloop, an optimization engine for the AI agents that customers build on its Kore.ai Agent Platform. Businesses set the targets, and Autoloop keeps adjusting the agents to hit them automatically, including after they’r

Oct 7, 2026

OneSpan Sign takes aim at the slow work around bank agreements

Authentication and digital agreements company OneSpan Inc. today unveiled new and planned features for its OneSpan Sign electronic signature service that go beyond the signing step. The update is aimed at the parts of the agreement process that slow down banks and other financial institutions. Elect

Oct 7, 2026

Similar Posts

What to expect during ‘The AI ROI in Contact Center Summit’: Join theCUBE Sept. 11

Contact center automation now has to produce results that businesses can measure. Enterprises are moving past broad claims about AI and asking how deployments affect operating costs, employee performance and service quality. TheCUBE Research frames the Sept. 11 “AI ROI in Contact Centers Summit” aro

Sep 9, 2026

Containment is dead: Five takeaways from the AI ROI in Contact Center Summit

Every vendor event has a center of gravity, and at theCUBE Research’s AI ROI in Contact Center Summit, it wasn’t a product. It was a metric this industry is finally ready to abandon. I co-hosted the summit recently with Bob Laliberte (pictured, left), principal analyst at theCUBE Research, and spoke

Sep 23, 2026

Five9 builds Humantic contact centers instead of full automation

Over the past couple of years, many companies have focused on increasing the share of contact center calls AI can handle without human intervention. That measure is starting to look too narrow, since the highest-value, most complex or most sensitive interactions are often the ones customers still wa

Sep 11, 2026

Orchestration is the new challenge for CX in the age of AI agents

Presented by Tata Communications Enterprises are deploying AI agents, voice AI, and automation across messaging, voice, and digital channels faster than the architecture meant to support it. Most of that deployment has involved attaching conversational AI to legacy systems never built for it, says

Aug 26, 2026