CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Microsoft 2.5: GitHub COO Kyle Daigle on stitching the developer universe together

From GeekWire

By Mary Jo Foley

October 9, 2026

Microsoft 2.5: GitHub COO Kyle Daigle on stitching the developer universe together

Microsoft 2.5: GitHub COO Kyle Daigle on stitching the developer universe together

GeekWire is profiling over the next few weeks some of the people and teams that are shaping the evolution of Microsoft in what we’re calling its “Microsoft 2.5” era.

A delicate dance: In August 2025, Microsoft moved to integrate GitHub into the mothership, under its CoreAI division, after having allowed it to run as a quasi-independent entity since acquiring it in 2018. At the same time, GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke announced he would leave the company at the end of the year.

A number of developers feared the worst: GitHub would become just another arm of Microsoft and lose the community-mindedness that had made it attractive to developers of all stripes, and especially open-source ones.

GitHub Chief Operating Officer Kyle Daigle — a 13-plus-year GitHub veteran — had been one of the main champions of the need to “keep GitHub GitHub.” He maintained that stance even after he added the “Chief Marketing Officer of Developer” title for all of Microsoft to his COO role in January 2026.

Microsoft 2.5

Kyle Daigle

GitHub COO and Microsoft CMO of Developer

  • What he does Besides serving as COO of GitHub, leads Microsoft developer audience marketing, plus developer relations across both GitHub and Microsoft.
  • Biggest challenges Breaking down barriers between developer teams across Microsoft while making sure not to leave any key legacy Microsoft developer products behind.
  • One key takeaway “We’ve always been a platform, not just a product. We need developers to build with us and on us.”

So, how has Microsoft done this past year with managing GitHub? In an interview with GeekWire, Daigle acknowledged that GitHub’s relationship with Microsoft has changed since the end of the standalone CEO era. But the goal is no longer just “don’t break GitHub.” It’s to export GitHub’s community, developer-first ethos and learnings across Microsoft.

GitHub has influence beyond just the GitHub product set now, Daigle said. And the fact that Microsoft opted to consolidate its developer-facing messaging and community outreach under Daigle, someone who came from GitHub, not from Microsoft’s traditional DevDiv organization, gives weight to his claim.

“Bringing teams together — engineering teams and marketing teams and everyone that wasn’t talking to each other before — has been a really big part of the work,” Daigle said. “I see all these opportunities for GitHub to directly help and impact the overall mission of Microsoft versus keeping it cloistered in a way that isn’t helping either GitHub’s mission or Microsoft’s mission.”

These days, developer teams across Microsoft and GitHub are sharing foundations and the GitHub Copilot software development kit across organizations “in a way that would have seemed improbable before,” he said.

As Microsoft historians know, “Microsoft’s challenge isn’t creating products. It’s connecting them,” Daigle said.

Growing pains: At the same time, the rise of AI agents has strained GitHub’s infrastructure. Over the past few months, GitHub has experienced some significant outages, including one in August that lasted nearly eight hours.

GitHub officials have said they are migrating from their own datacenters to Azure to try to ease some of the capacity issues. Daigle said it’s not a simple lift-and-shift process; rather, it’s a major re-architecture for the platform.

GitHub is roughly 60% through its Azure migration as of early October, he said.

It’s working with Azure storage teams on separating compute and storage for the Git distributed version control system to help alleviate bottlenecks caused by developers and agents working concurrently in the same repositories. Developers and agents made 7.38 billion commits on GitHub in September alone, according to the company.

GitHub’s recent growth would not have been manageable without Microsoft scaling expertise and Azure support, Daigle said. GitHub is in a unique position of being able to request major additional capacity, such as millions of CPUs, and work with Microsoft teams to provision it, he said.

The GitHub app and agent store: GitHub got its start as a platform for source control and collaboration. But its role is evolving as part of its Microsoft integration. In addition to developing and supporting Microsoft’s most successful Copilot, GitHub Copilot, GitHub has an important place in Microsoft’s agent-centric strategy.

GitHub is becoming “the store for anything that needs to be coded and needs some verification,” Daigle said. “We’ll connect you to whatever the right tool inside of Microsoft is for you to run that or whatever tool you’re using, not just (from) the Microsoft product suite.”

In the new world order, GitHub isn’t just the store for apps. Increasingly, it’s also the store for agents, which means GitHub is acting as the developer layer for Microsoft’s “agent factory” strategy.

Previously in this series

  • EVP Pavan Davuluri wants to remake Windows for both human and agent users
  • How EVP Charles Lamanna is helping turn Microsoft into the ‘Copilot company’
  • New security business chief Hayete Gallot on Microsoft’s push into the agentic era

See the full series →

(Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates envisioned Microsoft as a “software factory” that could produce software at scale. These days, CEO Satya Nadella and team talk about Microsoft as an “agent factory,” helping customers create agents at scale.)

GitHub currently serves more than 200 million developers, plus an unknown but quickly growing number of agents.

Developers need to be thinking in new ways when it comes to agents, Daigle said. They need to consider ideas such as scaling application programming interfaces (APIs) for agents separately from humans, creating APIs designed specifically for agents, rewriting documentation and tooling so agents can consume GitHub efficiently, and treating agent access as a fundamentally different workload from human access.

In the longer term, Daigle said he expects AI to make software economically viable for smaller audiences, such as a family, an individual or a single team. The app-store model may change substantially in the coming years, as people create highly specialized applications. GitHub could help like-minded users discover software for specific interests, such as a narrowly focused household or community use case.

GitHub historically has considered anyone who has seen or touched code to be part of the developer community. Daigle’s vision is for GitHub and Microsoft to let both professional developers and newer builders create and run software and agents without needing to manage token costs, uptime, monitoring or operational overhead.

GitHub will have more to say about its plans at the GitHub Universe conference in San Francisco, Oct. 28-29. The event won’t focus on code generation alone; it will include information on tools covering the full lifecycle, proactive security approaches and how to determine whether software is working well after deployment.

“We’re looking to solve the core parts of the platform, like Git, like Actions, in a way that I hope will make people excited and feel like they can absolutely trust GitHub for the next decade to come,” Daigle said.

View original article on geekwire.com

Most Recent

OpenAI revenue falls short, models play hopscotch and Trump cracks down on tech green cards

I’m not going to call the bursting of artificial intelligence bubble yet, not with all that money still pouring into every hardware and software company with AI in their pitch decks. But we got a little taste this week. OpenAI told investors this week that it actually had $18 billion less revenue th

Oct 9, 2026

18 insights from SailPoint’s Navigate event: Enterprises race to bring identity security for AI agents up to machine speed

Identity security for AI agents is a board priority, and enterprises at Navigate 2026 are moving to just-in-time access and named human owners.

Oct 9, 2026

Gallatin AI raises $50M in funding for its military logistics platform

Gallatin AI Inc., a developer of military logistics software, today announced that it has raised $50 million in funding. The Series A round included contributions from 8VC, Silent Ventures and several others. It follows a $15 million seed raise in 2024. El Segundo, California-based Gallatin has buil

Oct 8, 2026

Rocket fuel: Seattle-area startups raise a record $3.5B as national VC funding cools

Seattle-area startups raised $3.5 billion in venture capital in the third quarter, the most in any quarter going back at least a decade, led by big rounds for Kent-based rocket maker Stoke Space, Bellevue developer platform Temporal and Everett fusion company Helion. That’s more than triple the $1 b

Oct 8, 2026

Similar Posts

Satya Nadella reinvented Microsoft once. Can he do it again in the AI era?

After replacing Steve Ballmer in 2014, Satya Nadella turned Microsoft into a cloud giant. Now he's tasked with making the company a force in AI.

Oct 5, 2026

Microsoft unveils all-in-one Copilot app, taking on Anthropic and OpenAI in new push to boost adoption

Microsoft on Friday morning unveiled its long-promised Copilot “super app” — without officially calling it that — combining AI chat, coding and long-running agents into a unified app for business and personal use. The new version of the Copilot app adds sections called Home, which combines chat with

Sep 25, 2026

Microsoft 2.5: EVP Pavan Davuluri wants to remake Windows for both human and agent users

Pavan Davuluri, who runs Windows and Surface at Microsoft, is rebuilding the operating system so AI agents can run on it alongside people. In the latest installment of GeekWire's Microsoft 2.5 series, he talks with Mary Jo Foley about the vision for Windows and his commitment to improving quality an

Sep 10, 2026

Internal memos: Microsoft shakes up communications as Nadella makes a push to build in public

Microsoft is moving communications out of its marketing group and under Vice Chair and President Brad Smith, as CEO Satya Nadella calls for a fundamentally new approach that makes employees a bigger part of how the company tells its story.

Sep 24, 2026