CompaniesInvestorsPeople
Home
Loading

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

aVenture is in Beta: research coverage is expanding as we build, so please independently verify key details before making investment decisions.

Get in Touch

  • Contact

  • Request a Demo

  • Request Data Updates

  • Add a Company

Research

  • Companies

  • Investors

  • People

aVenture

  • Download App

  • Pricing

Download the aVenture Research beta for iOS and iPadOSDownload aVenture Research on the Mac App Store

Resources

  • Documentation

  • Use Cases

  • CLI

  • MCP

  • Feature Requests

  • Sitemap

Member

Backed by

Ask AI about aVenture

© aVenture Investment Company, 2026. All rights reserved.

San Francisco, CA, USA

Privacy · Terms of Service

aVenture Investment Company ("aVenture") is an independent research platform providing detailed analysis and data on startups, venture capital investments, and key industry individuals. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment advisor and does not provide investment advice or recommendations. The data provided by aVenture does not constitute recommendations or advice, whether by methodology, analysis, AI-generated content, or a statement written by a staff member of aVenture.

aVenture is not affiliated with any of the people, companies, organizations, government agencies, regulatory bodies, or investment funds we provide coverage for on this site unless explicitly stated otherwise. Users assume full responsibility for decisions made based on information obtained from this platform. Links to external websites do not imply endorsement or affiliation with aVenture. Any links that provide the ability to invest in a primary or secondary transaction in a company are for convenience only and do not constitute solicitations or offers to buy or sell an investment. Investors should exercise heightened precaution and due diligence when investing in private companies, especially those not independently audited.

While we strive to provide valuable insights with objectivity and professional diligence, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided on our platform. Before making any investment decisions, you should verify the accuracy of all pertinent details for your decision. To the fullest extent permitted by law, aVenture shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or financial damages arising from use of this site, whether by consumers of its contents directly or by persons or organizations covered by our research, even if we are advised of the possibility. Our best-efforts processes and correction request forms do not create a warranty or duty of care.

Profiles on this platform may include content generated in part by large language models (LLMs, artificial intelligence) that aggregate publicly available sources (e.g., SEC EDGAR, public filings, press releases). Source attribution is provided where known; always verify statements and claims here against original sources before relying on any data. Content on our site may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or what are commonly called 'hallucinations' if generated in part or in full by AI / LLMs. The risk can also exist even when content is written by a human, as internal and third-party sources may also have inaccuracies for the same or different reasons. While we randomly audit a proportion of content, this is not exhaustive.

We recommend that an independent auditor be hired to verify the accuracy of the information before relying on it for any sensitive decisions. By accessing this platform, you agree not to rely solely on any information generated by AI, aggregated, or sourced or written otherwise on this site, for investment, financial, or other decisions. aVenture assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, or hallucinations. You must independently verify all data from primary sources. Use of this platform constitutes your waiver of claims for reliance-based damages, including negligent misrepresentation. To report an error, request a correction, or dispute information about a company or individual, contact us via our request data updates form.

Loading
Loading
Home
News
Meta releases Muse Wonder AI models built to run personal and professional agents

From SiliconANGLE

By Duncan Riley

October 12, 2026

Meta releases Muse Wonder AI models built to run personal and professional agents

Meta releases Muse Wonder AI models built to run personal and professional agents

Meta Platforms Inc. today released Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, two artificial intelligence models it says are its most capable yet at running agents that handle personal and professional tasks.

Meta aimed the release at the longer, multistep jobs people hand off to an AI agent. One example it gave was working through an insurance claim. Coding is a strength, the company says, as are specialist fields such as law, finance and health.

Active Memory, one of two new features in the models, carries context about a user from one conversation to the next, bringing details up once they become relevant. The other, Active Focus, is meant to keep the model working when a task gets hard. According to Meta’s announcement, a stuck model will try other approaches and recover from errors, and it checks in with the user before following through on anything important.

Meta trained both models at its gigawatt-scale Prometheus data center, building on pretraining and reinforcement learning methods it introduced with Muse Spark in April. Prompts can mix text with video, audio and images across a 1 million-token context window. Answers come back only in text.

In the model card, Meta compared Muse Wonder Full against OpenAI Group PBC’s GPT-6 Astra and two Anthropic PBC models, Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5.5. Most tests ran every model at maximum reasoning effort. Meta’s runs of competing models were best-effort, the card cautions, and prompts and tools may not have been optimally tuned for them.

Muse Wonder Full delivered a passing result on 13.1% of tasks in Artificial Analysis’ version of Harvey’s Legal Agent Benchmark, where a deliverable counts only if it meets every criterion and passes hallucination checks. GPT-6 Astra came closest among the rivals at 8.6%.

Coding results were split. Muse Wonder Full led two long-horizon tests, DeepSWE 1.1 and SWE-Marathon, and posted 57.5% on the latter to 46.3% for Claude Opus 5.5. The card notes the SWE-Marathon figures are not a controlled comparison. Codex and Claude Code produced the leaderboard scores for GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1, and Meta’s model ran at an “xhigh” reasoning setting for that test. ProgramBench, which asks an agent to rebuild a complete program from scratch, went to Opus 5.5 by 70.5% to 59%.

Claude Opus 5.5 also finished ahead on HealthBench Pro and the OSWorld V2.1 computer-use benchmark. On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, a composite of evaluations the benchmarking firm runs itself, the Anthropic model came out two points clear at 58.

Meta has promised a full safety report soon. In the meantime, the model card says Meta does not rule out Muse Wonder Full reaching the high-risk threshold for chemical and biological threats when it runs without mitigations. Mitigations aimed at that domain include safety post-training and system-level classifiers. With those safeguards in place, the model rates “moderate or lower” across all three risk domains in the Meta Superintelligence Scaling Framework, including cybersecurity and loss of control.

Of the 92 flags Muse Wonder Full captured on the ExploitGym cyber benchmark, a verification pass found that 21 came through the vulnerability each challenge was designed around. The model got the other 71 through unintended weaknesses. Because ExploitGym’s published ranking counts only the intended route, 21 is the figure to compare with it, the company said. The cyber results come two months after Meta disclosed that one of its models had breached an outside organization during a cybersecurity test in which a setup error left the sandbox connected to the internet.

Meta’s research post calls Muse Wonder “our most aligned model to date.” On an agentic misalignment test, which checks whether an agent will act harmfully to advance its goals or avoid replacement or shutdown, Muse Wonder Full’s harmful-action rate was 0%.

Muse Wonder takes over the top of the Muse lineup from Muse Spark 1.3, which Meta Superintelligence Labs released six weeks ago. Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang, who runs the lab, described that model to Bloomberg as “competitive” with Claude Fable 5.1. Meta’s personal agent, Muse, has run on Muse Spark since its U.S. launch on Sept. 8.

Developers can use Muse Wonder starting today through the Meta Model API and Muse Code, the coding agent Meta introduced in August. Muse Wonder Full is limited to Muse Code subscribers. Meta said Muse Wonder will power its Muse agent soon, with subscribers getting it first.

View original article on siliconangle.com

Most Recent

Dell and Intel weigh the costs of enterprise AI scalability

Dell and Intel explore enterprise AI scalability as rising token costs prompt customers to weigh cloud models, on-premises options and existing infrastructure.

Oct 12, 2026

Microsoft debuts multichiplet Maia 300 inference accelerator

Microsoft Corp. today pulled back the curtains on Maia 300, its newest internally developed artificial intelligence accelerator. The chip is optimized for inference. Microsoft estimates that it can process 40% more tokens per megawatt than “leading GPU-based systems,” which is likely a reference to

Oct 12, 2026

What to expect from theCUBE’s Smarsh EDGE analysis: Tune in Oct. 15

Smarsh EDGE 2026 puts AI-powered compliance in focus as theCUBE covers communications intelligence, risk detection and governance in financial services.

Oct 12, 2026

Exclusive: Akuity adds Fleet Management to Kargo Enterprise to replace per-cluster pipelines

Software delivery platform company Akuity Inc. today added Fleet Management to its Kargo Enterprise platform to allow teams to ship one change across hundreds of Kubernetes clusters as a single release. Akuity is pitching it as a replacement for the per-cluster pipelines those teams maintain now. Th

Oct 12, 2026

Similar Posts

Meta says Muse Spark 1.3 has frontier performance — but its best results come from a model developers can’t broadly use yet

Meta’s newest AI model Muse Spark 1.3, unveiled yesterday, is faster and more performant on third-party benchmarks than its predecessor — with a caveat. "Muse Spark 1.3 is rolling out today with frontier performance almost too cheap to meter," Meta co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote on X, call

Sep 3, 2026

Muse Wonder

A frontier model that leads on personal and professional agents

Oct 11, 2026

Meta debuts its ‘secure by design’ personal AI agent Muse, stock rises 6%

Updated: Meta Platforms Inc. is betting that people will be more willing to adopt artificial intelligence agents if they’re simpler to use and they can be trusted. The social media giant today announced Muse, a personal AI agent that people can communicate with through a dedicated app and get it to

Sep 8, 2026

Meta says it has caught up with Anthropic and OpenAI with Muse Spark 1.3, its most powerful AI model yet

Meta Platforms Inc. says it has more or less caught up with the biggest artificial intelligence labs with the release of its most powerful large language model so far, Muse Spark 1.3. The company said in a blog post today that the new model can be accessed by developers willing to pay for it through

Sep 2, 2026