Tracxn set out to track every startup in the world and organize them into an enormous taxonomy of feeds. aVenture set out to build the deepest possible research record for venture-backed companies and link those records into a graph. Both are startup data platforms; the organizing idea is different, and that difference decides which one fits your work.
Tracxn facts below come from aVenture's public research record on the Tracxn Platform; our figures come from the same database, as recorded at the time of writing.
What Tracxn Platform is
Tracxn Platform is a global market intelligence platform from Tracxn Technologies Limited (founded 2012, Bangalore, by former Sequoia Capital and Accel investors). It tracks more than 7.1 million private companies organized across 3,000+ feeds and 55,300+ taxonomies, combining human analysts with technology to deliver structured intelligence for venture capital, private equity, corporate M&A, and investment banking professionals.
Tracxn serves 1,000+ customers across 50+ countries with deal discovery, due diligence, and portfolio tracking capabilities.
Where Tracxn is strong
- Taxonomy scale. More than 55,000 curated taxonomies over 7.1 million companies is an unmatched classification effort — if your question is "list every company in micro-sector X, globally," Tracxn built for exactly that.
- Global long tail. Coverage extends well beyond the US/EU venture mainstream, including markets most platforms track thinly.
- Analyst-in-the-loop model. Human analysts curate sector feeds, which keeps taxonomy assignments more deliberate than pure-algorithm tagging.
Where aVenture takes a different approach
A taxonomy tells you which bucket a company sits in. aVenture's graph tells you what the company is connected to. The platform tracks over 100,000 venture-backed startups from 1,200+ sources, and each record links outward:
- Competition from products, not buckets. Two companies in different taxonomy branches can fight for the same customer. aVenture joins competing products directly to each other and renders comparison tables from those joins — observed competition, not classified adjacency.
- People as connected records. Founder and operator career timelines link to every employer profile, with similar-people discovery computed from profile content.
- Funding with participants. Rounds link to the investors who joined them, so investor activity and portfolio patterns fall out of the same graph.
- Mentions and websites as evidence. News and blog articles join to the companies and products they discuss; research pipelines crawl and classify company websites to read positioning from structure.
- Provenance on every claim. Sources and change history are recorded on each record.
- An honest coverage note. Tracxn's 7.1M-company global universe — including the non-US long tail — is much broader than aVenture's today. Our depth concentrates on current venture-backed, primarily US companies while coverage of older, non-venture-backed, and international companies expands rapidly.
Where Tracxn scales through analysts plus technology, aVenture scales through agent-powered research pipelines that gather, classify, and source evidence from the public web continuously.
Feature comparison at a glance
- Coverage: 7.1M+ companies across all sectors (Tracxn) vs. 100,000+ venture-backed startups in depth (aVenture).
- Organizing model: 55.3K+ taxonomies and 3K+ feeds (Tracxn) vs. a linked graph of companies, products, people, investors, and news (aVenture).
- Competitive mapping: taxonomy adjacency (Tracxn) vs. explicit product-to-product competitor joins with side-by-side tables (aVenture).
- Research operation: human analysts + technology (Tracxn) vs. agent-scaled pipelines with recorded provenance (aVenture).
- People data: team listings (Tracxn) vs. linked career timelines and similarity discovery (aVenture).
- Buyers: VC, PE, M&A, and banking teams across 50+ countries (Tracxn) vs. individual researchers and investors (aVenture).
Pricing
- Tracxn: subscription platform; pricing is quote-based and not recorded as a public list price in our database.
- aVenture: See current aVenture plans and pricing.
Which one fits your workflow
Choose Tracxn if you need exhaustive sector sweeps — every company in a niche, worldwide, pre-sorted into curated feeds — for deal sourcing or market sizing at scale.
Choose aVenture if you go deep on venture-backed companies: the product-level competitive map, linked people and funding records, mention history, and website evidence turn one company lookup into a complete research file.
Company lookup in the aVenture macOS app.
How we sourced this comparison
Tracxn Platform and aVenture Research Platform are joined as competing products in aVenture's own research graph — the same public record that supplied every Tracxn fact above. The comparison table feature this article imitates in markdown is what the platform renders natively.